November 11, 2009
Veteran's Day
The monuments in Washington all seemed false in the cool morning mist. They were big and white and extravagant, yet the tourists cheapened them somehow as they gawked, took photos, and scurried to the next place on their list of things to see. Their attention seemed to focus on what things were rather than why they were. The scene was a poor example of Americana. Even Honest Abe seemed to frown from his throne. Of all the walls of stone only one seemed real.
This wall's long black marble slices into the ground. On it are engraved fifty-eight thousand American names from an undeclared war that no one wants to remember in the jungles of a country half a globe away. There are no ornate scrolls or stenciled directions, no fancy faded pieces of parchment, no self-serving sentiments, just names.
There's also a statue some distance away. Three bronze soldiers stare into the wall, waiting for word of their fellow soldiers, or perhaps morning their loss. The soldiers don't talk; they simply stare. They are all just boys, most of them only six years older than I was then: nineteen.
Under the statue-soldier's gaze, an elderly man lagged behind a tour at the wall. He caressed it and knelt to leave a single rose at its based. He sobbed. He had difficulty standing up. A nearby park attendant helped him and asked, "One of yours, sir?" The old man shook his head and replied, "Not just one of them. All of them."
I penned those words in the fall of 1989... 20 years ago.
They are an excerpt of a story I authored as an 18-year-old college freshman. It was based upon a trip to Washington D.C., and to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial, simply known to all as The Wall. It is fictionalized, but only just. To this day it remains one of the most emotional places I've ever visited.
At the time, Vietnam was our most recent "major" conflict, though I know all wars are major are those who fight them. We were still several years away from the first Gulf War, and more than a decade from 9/11 and the wars that followed in Afghanistan and Iraq that we still fight today.
I'm met dozens of veterans since that time, from World War Two, Korea, Vietnam and our current wars. I've tried to thank them for their service, but mere words always feel inadequate to capture the gratitude I feel for all they have sacrificed so that I can live in a land of freedom and liberty.
I've tried to explain the sacrifices they've made as best I can to my older daughter. I've told her some of what I know about my Uncle Bobby's war in Korea, where he had the harrowing duty of splicing damaged communications lines for forward observers while in combat. I tried to tell her of how her grandfather—who we buried just before last Veteran's Day—stood guard against saboteurs in the wet salt spray as victory ships burned from to the torpedoes of German U-boats off the Carolina Coast.
I've told her what I know of some of our local heroes that I know she's heard of and seen, and of those who quietly walk among us with little recognition at all.
Today is the day we thank all veterans who have served this nation and who put their lives on the line to preserve our way of life.
Words are not enough, but all the same, thank you.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:32 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 590 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Thank you.
Paul B CPO USCG(ret)
Posted by: Paul B at November 11, 2009 11:06 AM (18qns)
2
Our first visit to the Wall was an emotional one that I won't soon forget even though it was many years ago.
I was overcome with emotion. We were there to honor all Veterans. My husband served 4 tours in Vietnam and served in the Navy 26 years, so it was personal. But more personal because we have a family member on the wall, our former brother-in-law:
WE WILL NOT FORGET
DELBERT RAY PETERSON
MAJ - O4 - Air Force - Reserve
His tour began on Nov 1, 1965
Casualty was on Mar 9, 1966
In THUA THIEN, SOUTH VIETNAM
Hostile, died while missing, FIXED WING - CREW
AIR LOSS, CRASH ON LAND
Body was not recovered
Vietnam Wall: Panel 05E - Line 133
After visiting the Wall, we were walking around looking at some of the table exhibits set up along the walkway. There at the POW/MIA table, you could donate $10 and reach into a grab bag for one of those bracelets we all used to wear with the name of one of the POW or MIA names. We asked to reach in the Navy bag, but were informed they had no Navy bracelets left, so we took whatever was offered. I reached in and pulled out a bracelet and my knees went weak. There in my hand was the bracelet for: Delbert Ray Peterson. What are the odds?
I took that bracelet and read the material that was included about Del. Some of it was way out of date. So I wrote to the proper agency and provided them with updated info. I then packed the bracelet and sent it off to Del's niece, Raylynna his brother's child, who was born the same day that Del was shot down and named for him. Del was shot down before he'd had a chance to live his life, marry or have children.
Today my mind is on all Veterans of all wars, but most especially of those who served in Vietnam. Thank you all.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) at November 11, 2009 02:01 PM (nas9l)
3
PS: Del was seen alive on the ground after the crash. He was seen being surrounded by the enemy. After that, there has never been another word. He was listed only as MIA for 20 years and then at some point the AF changed the designation to Assumed dead, and finally to the way it is listed above, Hostile, died while missing. He is listed on the Wall as MIA.
Posted by: Sara (Pal2Pal) at November 11, 2009 02:09 PM (nas9l)
4
I was there.
USAF '68-'72 SSGT. Missiles, 366 MMS, Da Nang 1969-1970.
Posted by: Marc at November 11, 2009 05:20 PM (Zoziv)
5
The Wall.
The only monument that brought me to tears .... even just thinking about it does so.
Thanks and gratitude to Veterans.
Posted by: Pandora at November 11, 2009 07:05 PM (/8Bs3)
6
Thank You CY.
Tim 2/78FA US Army 75/80
Posted by: 1903A3 at November 12, 2009 06:48 AM (E8ZSe)
7
Blech. He was clearly trying to depict this as a "tragedy", which is something that happens because of cruel fate, or accident, or foolishness. Horse pucky. This was an act of war and treason, by an enemy of America.
The tragedy is the atmosphere of fear of confrontation, AKA PC-ism, which prevented the military or law from stopping this jihad-evangelist long ago. And that is an atmosphere he personally encourages and fosters, and was continuing to encourage and foster in his crocodile-tear speech.
The man is a human Trojan Horse.
Posted by: Brian H at November 12, 2009 07:31 AM (+1/Nd)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 09, 2009
Bush Visits Hood Wounded, Families
I just wish that Fox News had embargoed
the story of the visit and honored the former President's wishes of keeping the meeting secret.
I would imagine that visiting the families of servicemen killed and wounded is among the most emotional experiences that any President will encounter, and the fact that George and Laura Bush took the time to be with those impacted by Major Hasan's jihadist rampage says quite a bit about their character.
I hope the visit was able to provide the families and those wounded with some inspiration and comfort.
President and Mrs. Obama are due to make an appearance at a formal memorial service tomorrow. I suspect they will spend time with the troops as well.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:20 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 130 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Don't hold your breath.
Posted by: jim at November 09, 2009 12:40 PM (eXdIs)
2
One thing we can be sure of. If President and Mrs. Obama attend the memorial service tomorrow, it will be one huge photo op for the Obamas, not a private visit of condolence for the families. And the President will take an opportunity to talk about himself and his reaction, rather than express privately his sympathy and support for the grieving families as George and Laura Bush did.
Marianne Matthews
Posted by: Marianne Matthews at November 09, 2009 02:48 PM (VbbNx)
3
Thrice Barry has attempted to address Ft Hood. Thrice he has muffed it. In the First Americans incident we could perhaps say he was ill prepared but a "shout out"? He has his hands in the air like he just don't care! But duty now calls and it is perhaps not too much to say that the first qualifying ability in a politician is to project sincerity. Now, it may be merely a projection but if the projection is good and clear we never know it. But Barack has failed in the first regard; he cannot even fake interest in terrorism, not least because he has already declared that it does not exist. Per Michelle, this conversation does not help his kids. Now he will be at a scripted event. Is it too much to hope he can manage it without making a fool of himself? In my view, yes, it is too much to ask. This doofus is an adolescent on his best day.
Posted by: megapotamus at November 09, 2009 03:09 PM (wJMs3)
4
I suspect they will spend time with the troops as well.
NO, They will allow the troops to admire them.
Posted by: 1sttofight at November 09, 2009 05:41 PM (J9v5T)
5
Did you see that they've built a huge wall of conexes around the memorial site so Barry doesn't have to see any of us in Redneckland during his visit?
Posted by: Mike in Texas at November 10, 2009 09:53 AM (K6uRa)
6
Thank God for this Fort Hood shootings huh? I haven't seen you people so excited and jubilant. I mean, some fo the victims weren't even dead yet and you were already dancing on the internets like the 9/11 Palestinians dancing in the streets. You prayed for 10 months for anything, something like this to happen on Barry's watch and now, WOW!!! Let the extremist partiers dance in the streets louder and brighter than Hezbullah did after 9/11.
We're having a "Celebrate Obama Sucks" keg party at some of the funerals for the dead people who thankfully got murdered at Fort Hood. We want to pay respects for those who suffered and died so we can politicize it for the tea-bagger cause. We don't care who they are or what their names are. All we care about is exploiting them to attack Obama. Hope you all can make it. We're going to put Obama is a Nazi porta-potties right on their graves. You'll love it!
Posted by: Lipiwitz at November 11, 2009 04:06 AM (bhNGz)
7
Oh Gawd, Bush is still using our brave soldiers for photo ops? His two foolish wars are directly related to the deaths of our brave soldiers at Ft. Hood.
The Army knew back in 2007 that Hasan was a ticking time bomb and did nothing much like Bush did nothing before 9/11 after receiving piles of evidence from US and foreign intelligence reports.
Go away George and take Sarah Palin with you!
Posted by: NuBOmB at November 11, 2009 11:07 AM (h/EEo)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 02, 2009
Matrix Producer to Film Muhamad Flick
Obviously, Roman Polanski must direct.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:33 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 17 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I was going to say the same thing. How in the world are they going to do a movie about Muhamad without showing Muhamad and causing riots throughout the Islamic world?
The Polanski connection comes from the fact that Polanski raped a 13 year old girl while Muhamad married a 6 year old and slept with her at age 9. Both had sex with kids.
Posted by: James S. at November 03, 2009 12:35 AM (J2ejK)
Posted by: -30- at November 03, 2009 06:01 PM (pkbux)
3
I would not be surprised if Polanski gets involved in this flick as part of his "rich or famous people get community service and probation" sentence.
Posted by: DoorHold at November 08, 2009 11:32 AM (EeTHH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 30, 2009
The Class of the Liberal Elite
Über liberal Gore Vidal takes the disgusting practice of blaming the victim to the extreme, outrageously calling the 13-year-old rape victim that Roman Polanski drugged and brutalized, "
a hooker."
Quick, someone award him a Nobel Prize for Literature.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:35 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 50 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Remeber that Imus used the same language and the MSM got rid of him. Will they do that to the Great Gore?
Posted by: David at October 30, 2009 11:15 AM (PpoBw)
2
Either these people have absolutely no clue how bad they look when they do these things or the people they are trying to please are worse then they are. Of course, one famous business once said about the press something along the lines of, good, bad, whatever, just spell the name right.
This might simply be a way to stay in the press and have their names passed around. Perhaps it is our job to see that it doesn't get passed around, read, or watched? No t.v. here, I dropped the papers a bit before I dropped t.v., and I only read the bible, people like Chesterton, and well established classics up to a point. Gore who?
Posted by: Doom at October 30, 2009 11:43 AM (VB9Cw)
3
That old man is truly disgusting. He's an arrogant old patrician who must feel profoundly cheated that this country never paid him his proper due; he's in a permanent state of lese majeste. There's a grave waiting for Gore Vidal and I think he should shuffle along into it as soon as possible.
Posted by: zhombre at October 30, 2009 04:16 PM (kLU+g)
4
Is this self-description, irony or hypocrisy by Al Gore?
Apparently, in Al Gore's world, hookers cannot be crime victims. Fascinating. Assuming of course, that underage victim of Roman Polanski's drug fueled rape was a "hooker".
Posted by: Penfold at October 30, 2009 04:16 PM (lF2Kk)
5
My bad, thought it read Al Gore, though is there any difference?
Posted by: Penfold at October 30, 2009 04:17 PM (lF2Kk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 26, 2009
Conservatives Top Liberals, Moderates as Top Ideological Group
So sayeth Gallup:
Conservatives continue to outnumber moderates and liberals in the American populace in 2009, confirming a finding that Gallup first noted in June. Forty percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36% as moderate, and 20% as liberal. This marks a shift from 2005 through 2008, when moderates were tied with conservatives as the most prevalent group.
Let's keep those percentages in mind the next time we see a heavily-slanted poll that significantly under-samples Republicans and over-samples Democrats.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:08 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 98 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's a shame that a lot of 'em stayed home on Nov. 4, 2008.
BTW, don't confuse "conservative" with "Republican".
Posted by: Diogenes Online at October 26, 2009 10:00 AM (2MrBP)
2
Remember though, the staff at the NYT generally considers itself to be moderate.
Posted by: kevin at October 26, 2009 10:45 AM (HjDx5)
3
It is a shame, Diogenes, but not a surprise, as there was no conservative candidate for President running on a major party ticket that time. You had the choice between an ultra-liberal Chicago corrupt Democrat, and a slightly liberal Republican who had shown over the years that he had great disdain for the conservative wing of his party.
In football, sometimes when your team is mediocre, you basically toss out everyone and start fresh - it's painful for a couple of years, but if the right people are put in place, you're usually back winning long before you would have otherwise.
Unfortunately for the Republicans, they didn't do that this time, so we're pretty much resigned to a much longer period of mediocrity.
Posted by: Skip at October 26, 2009 03:01 PM (G2eJS)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 24, 2009
Victicrat
Look closely, and you'll see James O'Keefe, the filmmaker who nailed ACORN for supporting child sex trafficking, wearing a pimp suit once again... and dancing.
Badly.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:18 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 28 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Badly.
All the girlies say he's pretty fly for a white guy.
Posted by: Pablo at October 24, 2009 11:22 PM (yTndK)
2
Whatchu talkin' bout?!?!? O'Keefe was gettin' DOWN!!!
These posers wouldn't last 30 seconds in Compton but the message was pretty catchy.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at October 25, 2009 05:41 PM (OX5qU)
3
These posers wouldn't last 30 seconds in Compton but the message was pretty catchy.
Why's that, Lippy? Is there something about Compton you'd like to tell us?
Posted by: Pablo at October 25, 2009 06:38 PM (yTndK)
4
Okeefe is a great dancer, what a unique kinda guy. Wonder why Letterman hasn't booked him and Hannah. Who were the posers?
Posted by: Jayne at October 25, 2009 11:31 PM (dwIL0)
5
Not at all Pablo. You should visit there yourself. You'll love it!
Posted by: Lipiwitz at October 28, 2009 02:58 AM (bhNGz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 16, 2009
I don't Get the Controversy
It's the only thing she's ever posted online that was worth the amount of time it took to understand it.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:41 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 30 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Welcome to The World, Meghan - you know, the one that existed before you entered it and will continue to after you exit. All women need to understand that in order to look good (whether "good" is professional or sexy or fit or whatever's appropriate for the occasion), they must dress for their particular body type. Meghan has an awesome rack, but she needs to accept that if she posts a pic in which her GINORMOUS boobs are half exposed and the focal point of the photo, she will likely look like a tramp. Don't bitch about it. Just accept it. And put on real shirt.
Posted by: Sif at October 16, 2009 08:28 PM (od0G0)
2
I'm starting to think that she's a lot sharper than most folks realize.
Considering how dumb I think she is, that might be true and she'd STILL be rather stupid.
And people mocked Palin's intellect ....
Posted by: Steve at October 17, 2009 07:58 AM (TzDt5)
3
She'd call them "knockers," if she could spell it.
Posted by: Bleepless at October 17, 2009 06:50 PM (7l1hN)
4
The Democrat party is full of boobs, so I don't understand why they would object to Meggie Mac's ramblings. For most conservatives, she's just irrelevant.
Posted by: daleyrocks at October 18, 2009 12:23 PM (5Fo+S)
5
Like someone else once said, "I'd snork her in the squeaker hole".
Posted by: Boss429 at October 18, 2009 04:32 PM (T/k/7)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 12, 2009
Like E.F. Hutton Said... You Earned It.
Progressive bloggers pushing for the adoption of the LGBT agenda President Obama said he would implement on their behalf have now been given the cold shoulder by the White House. Once they complained that Obama failed to live up to his campaign promises, they were summarily dismissed by the Administration as part of "
the internet left fringe" that needs to "
take off their pajamas."
The reaction to the betrayal is as you would expect, with lots of wailing and gnashing of teeth.
I guess it isn't quite so funny when the real teabaggers are dismissed just as easily as those smeared as such.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:07 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 117 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Sure, I figured that the gay community will get from Obama pretty much what Reagan gave the "Pro-Life" community ... lots of words with the best of intentions, but this White House seems to have lost their minds.
Now, every gab at the White House is personal.
Go ahead Barack
et al ... insult your critics into submission. Even Bush wasn't that stupid. I apparently missed this technique for making friends and influencing people.
Posted by: Neo at October 12, 2009 12:11 PM (tE8FB)
2
Wow. Another promise with an expiration date. Who would have thunk it. Besides, where the heck are they going to go, to the Republicans. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!11!!1
Posted by: TimothyJ at October 12, 2009 03:26 PM (IKKIf)
3
"real teabaggers" -- At the risk of being politically incorrect, that's kind of funny!
Posted by: Lipiwitz at October 13, 2009 04:13 AM (bhNGz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 10, 2009
Diluted
Democrats in the media and in politics have so over-used cries to racism in an attempt to marginalize legitimate opposition that the word has rapidly lost the stigma attached to it. Indeed, in the context of the political blogosphere, bloggers on the center-right have been using the term self-referentially as a sarcastic bit of snark to the constant knee-jerk claims of racism they know will radiate from progressives.
It's a shame the left has decided to make such reckless use of the word in an attempt to stifle opposition, because when real racism occurs, calling it out with the level of derision it deserves becomes that much more difficult.
This is real racism.
When you walk into the Georgia Peach Oyster Bar in Paulding County, you feel like you've walked into a different era.
Behind the pool tables stands a mannequin in a Klu Klux Klan costume, but it's what's outside of the Patrick Lanzo's restaurant that has some people angry.
Lanzo put up a sign that reads "Obama's plan for health-care: N*&%*r rig it."
Keep that link bookmarked, lefties. The next time you feel the urge to tar someone as a racist as a catch-all smear, you can use that as a touchstone.
Sadly, labeling people such as Lanzo as a racist simply isn't the pejorative it once was, thanks to those who have turned the label into a joke.
Update: Another Black Conservative is on the same wavelength.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:29 AM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 242 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"The term 'racist has been seriously over-used recently. It's time for a one month moratorium on the word to allow it to build up power again. Until then, use xenophobe, sexist, homophobe or fascist to get your insult across."
- Democrat arguing guidelines
Posted by: Kevin at October 10, 2009 09:16 AM (hNk8s)
2
Mr. Yankee,
Go read:
http://www.politicalbyline.com/2009/10/10/georgia-oyster-bar-owner-not-telling-the-truth-about-being-a-racist/
Might wanna make a mention of it.
-Pat
Posted by: Pat at October 10, 2009 09:58 AM (BH4he)
3
Easy folks, we are dealing with an
Psychological illness
It explains much of the left's behaviour and we should definetly make use of this suggestion from the article:
"Humor has great value in any attempt to work with projection..."
So when they complain that we are making fun of them, it's okay, it's part of their therapy.
I feel better already.
Posted by: Dr Hooligan at October 10, 2009 10:56 AM (wMqJV)
4
@Pat: bringing facts into this discussion will go nowhere. It's hate that is cultivated here.
Posted by: e40 at October 10, 2009 12:05 PM (rsjdo)
5
Meh. You think that's racist?
THIS is racist.
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/10/kill-blue-eyed-babies.html#readfurther
Posted by: Steve at October 10, 2009 12:24 PM (vafEQ)
6
>>"The next time you feel the urge to tar someone as a racist as a catch-all smear, you can use that as a touchstone."
You lead a sheltered life if you think that is the touchstone of racism.
Posted by: Steve at October 10, 2009 12:26 PM (vafEQ)
7
Bob sees the N-word and the light bulb goes off.
For the record, racism is about hate, not just words. Hate based on superiority is racism.
And, it comes in many different forms.
But, you'd know that now wouldn't you Bob?
Posted by: Bob is clueless at October 10, 2009 12:49 PM (BV0VE)
8
Pat, what is interesting is that if you go to Stormfront, they are offering the exact type of defense that Bob is here: a very narrow definition of racism that suits their need.
Grow a pair and be proud of your racist leanings.
Posted by: Seriously at October 10, 2009 03:30 PM (BV0VE)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 08, 2009
Fake Mais Précis
Apparently, the Obama's questionable taste in art includes a penchant for frauds.
Alma Thomas' 1963 "Watusi (Hard Edge)" is unmistakably a knock-off of Henrí Matisse's 1953 "L'Escargot." No, I'm not an art buff, the symmetry is uncanny, and forms a near-perfect overlay.
In other news, Michelle Malkin is plagiarizing my original.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:12 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 57 words, total size 1 kb.
1
well it takes a good froud to apreciate a good froud...
Posted by: rumcrook® at October 09, 2009 11:25 AM (60WiD)
Posted by: rumcrook® at October 09, 2009 11:26 AM (60WiD)
3
There's no fraud here whatsoever.
She traveled to France, fell in love with the Matisse piece, announced that she was going to do her own "study" of it and did so - publicly and openly.
This happens all of the time in the art world. Don't forget that we're seeing these two images in 2 inch squares on flat computer monitors. The two pieces are of different sizes using different techniques and materials creating different textures.
If she HADN'T written extensively about the fact that this was a "study" of Matisse, then we could easily accuse her of fraud.
Posted by: Able Stanton at October 09, 2009 01:36 PM (O64c3)
4
It shows Obama's bad taste in art? In fact, it shows just the opposite. Obama was able to recognize the artistic merit of a work by one of the world's greatest artists, even though he had no idea who painted it.
Posted by: Green Eagle at October 10, 2009 02:54 PM (iuhJB)
5
" Obama was able to recognize the artistic merit of a work by one of the world's greatest artists, even though he had no idea who painted it."
Not only did he not have any idea, he has no clue.
Posted by: Cowboy Logic at October 12, 2009 12:17 PM (vog1p)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
RDU Acclaimed as #1 in Daily Beast America's Smartest Cities Ranking
Obviously, they chose to forget the IQ displayed by Duke University's
Gang of 88, but overall, I agree with
their assessment.
I've been working in the Research Triangle Park most of my adult life and have worked with and for some brilliant companies (including my current employer), and advanced degrees are commonplace. Combine that with the overall culture and climate, and it's a tough place to bet against.
That said, their methodology is questionable, even as it is flattering.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:53 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 101 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I'd think the presence of all those NC state politicians (or Bev Perdue alone) would be enough to knock Raleigh waaaay down the list.
Posted by: jdb at October 08, 2009 06:22 PM (Dj4BX)
2
"I am obliged to confess I should sooner live in a society governed by the first two thousand names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the two thousand faculty members of Harvard University."
William F. Buckley
Posted by: Actual at October 09, 2009 12:22 PM (j5fpu)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 07, 2009
In Chicago, Blameshifting on Youth Violence Continues
Loyal Bloomberg employee John McCormick certainly knows who signs his paycheck. McCormick's article
Chicago Violence Haunts Obama as Gun-Control Backers Left Cold laments the fact that when U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder meet with Chicago Mayor Richard Daley today, they won't be able to blame Chicago's most recent and high profile youth death on firearms.
Honor student Derrion Albert was beaten to death with splinted railroad ties on September 24 by other youths in a crime that was captured on cell phone video and broadcast around the world.
Gun control vultures are predictably dismayed that they cannot use Albert's young corpse as a prop:
Some gun-control advocates question the administration's timing as Duncan and Holder arrive after a highly publicized beating that didn't involve a gun.
Missed Opportunities
"Where there have been opportunities for the president to speak out about the issue of firearm violence, he has missed any number of opportunities," said Thom Mannard, executive director of the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence.
Doing so in the Albert case "provides the cover" to address youth violence without confronting the gun lobby, said Mannard, whose group's board of directors included Duncan until he left for his current post.
Groups like the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence, the Violence Policy Center and the Brady Campaign have a structural flaw in their basic underlying philosophy. They have deluded themselves into thinking that a banning a device (a firearm) will somehow mitigate the cultural problem of violence in certain groups. It doesn't work that way, as Derrion Albert's death at the hands of an angry mob of his peers so readily proved.
A subculture that accepts, embraces, and glorifies violence in their entertainment (music, video games, television shows, movies, etc) unsurprisingly develops and nurtures individuals and groups that accept, embrace, and glorifies violence in the real world. Individuals so desensitized to violence find it socially acceptable—in many instances expected—to affect violence upon others with found objects, homemade weaponry, or their fists and feet.
Put bluntly, most pay lip service to the idea of quelling violence, but none are willing to face the fierce opposition that will arise when the offending subcultures are named, nor are they willing to face the economic backlash of taking on industries that make billions profiteering off the glorification of this lifestyle.
Such reflection is necessary for change, but interests that thrive of the status quo—Hollywood, record companies, clothing manufacturers, professional victims advocates, politicians, lobbyists, etc.—have no motivation to cut their own profits merely because urban youth are killing themselves in neighborhoods they will never visit.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
02:14 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 447 words, total size 3 kb.
1
Arrest, try, and emprison, Mayor Daley, the city council and Daley's backers. They are the only persons legally allowed to have handguns in the Peoples' Republic of Chicago. As we know gun control absolutely workd and criminals never get guns, it must the legal gun owners, Daley and his cronies doing all the shooting. Stands to reason.
Posted by: DavidL at October 07, 2009 03:13 PM (AK8DM)
2
The underlying problem is multigeneration fatherlessness. Neither Chicago's or the nation's wealthy Progressive elites want to go anyway near belling the illegitimacy cat because to do so is to undermine the sexual revolution; and to correct this problem will require a sea change that reestablishes Christian marriage as the universal norm in America. Both prospects are unacceptable to America's wealthy Progressive elite. Chicago will have more fatherlessness, more crime, more dead kids, more Black males in prison, and more taxpayer funded helping professionals. And the Kabuki theater about gun control will continue.
Posted by: Mike O'Malley at October 07, 2009 04:04 PM (5CVyu)
3
The underlying problem is multi-generational fatherlessness. Neither Chicago's or the nation's wealthy Progressive elites want to go anyway near belling the illegitimacy cat because to do so is to undermine the sexual revolution; and to correct this problem will require a sea change that reestablishes Christian marriage as the universal norm in America. Both prospects are unacceptable to America's wealthy Progressive elite. So Chicago will have more fatherlessness, more crime, more dead kids, more Black males in prison, and more taxpayer funded helping professionals. And the Kabuki theater about gun control will continue.
Posted by: Mike O'Malley at October 07, 2009 04:07 PM (5CVyu)
4
>>"Groups like the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence, the Violence Policy Center and the Brady Campaign have a structural flaw in their basic underlying philosophy. They have deluded themselves into thinking that a banning a device (a firearm) will somehow mitigate the cultural problem of violence in certain groups."
You give them way too much credit. They are indifferent to violence. They oppose private citizens owning firearms, full stop. If you could prove to them beyond a shadow of a doubt that private ciizens bearing arms led to a reduction in violence, their position would not change, because their position is not contingent on the amount of violence in the world.
Posted by: Steve at October 07, 2009 04:37 PM (9HZWQ)
5
"A subculture that accepts, embraces, and glorifies violence in their entertainment (music, video games, television shows, movies, etc) unsurprisingly develops and nurtures individuals and groups that accept, embrace, and glorifies violence in the real world."
Bob I gotta call you on this one.
Humans are inherently violent and our entertainment is merely a reflection of that. In fact I'd go so far as to postulate that movies and video games provide an outlet for humanities' violent nature.
There are fewer wars, armies, and general bloodshed in one's everyday life than there were even 100 years ago. Violent individuals found their outlets in crime (or law enforcement) as they still do. They also has the "frontier wars" in America and the various conflicts that raged across Europe that culminated in WWI and II. We are creatures of violent habit in a world where real violence is less and less acceptable (unless your Muslim) and virtual violence becomes the outlet.
Posted by: Scott at October 07, 2009 06:02 PM (sQmd1)
6
There is violence and there is violence. Portrayals of righteous violence - St. George slaying the dragon - onscreen probably do provide a catharstic of some kind while reinforcing the idea of right and wrong - violence as a final resort to preserve the moral and social order. Grand Theft Auto, on the other hand, may provide a cathartic experience, but does not encourage a moral sense at all, to put it mildly (I have seen it played, and it is just as bad as folks say). Augustine of Hippo argued that all violence is caused by the presence of evil, but not all violence is evil in and of itself, I believe. It is a useful distinction, think.
Another issue is that violence, as well as any other strong emotion, can be titullating as well as cathartic, and thus encourage violence instead of merely providing an outlet for something already there. It is a hard line to draw, unfortunately, but I think Bob is right that at least some of the blame can be laid upon the entertainment industry, which seems to lean heavily towards titullation. What we see and listen to does have an effect on the character, I would imagine.
Incidentally, it is interesting to note that while our ancestors may have been more violent, we are more removed from the real effects. We see it portrayed all around us onscreen, but few of us have any real experience with violent death, even animal death, first hand. Most of our ancestors had to kill their own chickens for Sunday dinner, or saw them killed at any rate, and natural death of humans was more immediate and common for them. We may be as much or more likely to treat violence casually than they (or maybe not, depending on place and time), but much more squeamish about it in the real world. Interesting to reflect on, though what significance it may have I am not sure.
Posted by: Grey Fox at October 08, 2009 10:40 AM (d1ae8)
7
Are you kidding? Gang members VOTE!
Posted by: bobdog at October 09, 2009 01:47 PM (SKEgy)
8
all 18 year olds who are legally entitled to carry rifles should be give/loaned weapons by the NRA many of them are unable to afford to purchase them on their own.
Posted by: John ryan at October 09, 2009 01:57 PM (gj3cv)
9
all 18 year olds who are legally entitled to carry rifles should be give/loaned weapons by the NRA many of them are unable to afford to purchase them on their own.
Silly liberal. The
CMP should be doing that, not the NRA.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at October 09, 2009 03:19 PM (gAi9Z)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
October 05, 2009
September 28, 2009
Silence! Do Not Speak Ill of Chicago!
A Chicago television station has been
forced to pull a story that many of Chicago's residents don't want the 2016 Olympics in their city. I'd be more worried about Chicago's residents if I was an Olympic athlete or spectator.
From 2000-2008 there were 4,855 homicides in Chicago, though there have been just 285 so far this year.
Hope and Change! And a more fitting logo:
"We'll send one of ours to the podium. We'll send one of yours to the morgue."
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
12:38 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 95 words, total size 1 kb.
1
With the out-of-control violence in that town right now, I don't see how they can expect to get the Olympics.
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 28, 2009 02:08 PM (OX5qU)
2
Atlanta has a much higher homocide rate than Chicago.
And who among us can forget the carnage wreaked upon Olympic athletes when the games were held there?
Posted by: Alex at September 28, 2009 05:41 PM (TOox3)
3
Alex,
I live in Atlanta, and attended many events - it is escaping me what "carnage wrecked upon the Olympic athletes" you are referring to. Maby in your dreams, but not to the athletes.
If you are referring to the bombing at Centennial Park, that was horrible - but no olympic athletes experienced any "carnage." My son was in the park that night, and we had FBI guests in our home a week later. They were interviewing anyone that was in the park for clues. It was a very unfortunate incident - but did not detract from a great Olympics that helped Atlanta shine - the positive impact on Atlanta is still being felt today.
Sorry, but your revision of history is not accurate.
Yours truely,
Slimedog
Posted by: slimedog at September 28, 2009 09:18 PM (u/SHz)
4
"With the out-of-control violence in that town right now, I don't see how they can expect to get the Olympics."
Lipiwitz - Why couldn't that putz Obama do anything about the violence when he was a State Senator and a U.S. Senator from Illinois? He has been perpetually ineffective.
Posted by: daleyrocks at September 28, 2009 09:47 PM (3O5/e)
5
daleyrocks -- apparently you're a huge fan of Mayor Daley from Chicago. Why don't you ask him?
Posted by: Lipiwitz at September 29, 2009 08:17 AM (OX5qU)
6
With the out-of-control violence in that town is right.
Posted by: jessic at September 30, 2009 12:01 AM (E6tGG)
7
Ya think, Lippy? What has Obama ever done to actually reduce crime? You got anything? He pushed those anti-profiling bills the cops hate which don't make sense, so he's got that going for him, which is nice. He's also for strict gin control so the criminals can prey on innocent citizens at will, so he's got that too.
You got anything?
Posted by: daleyrocks at October 01, 2009 11:07 PM (3O5/e)
8
I hear Munich is a peaceful city.
Wait ...
Posted by: DoorHold at October 04, 2009 11:47 AM (EeTHH)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 31, 2009
A Monster is Murdered, and Nothing is Gained
"Two wrongs don't make a right."
That childhood admonition stuck with me over the years, and was the first thought to pop into my head when I read that an infanticide practitioner by the name of George Tiller was gunned down in a Wichita, KS church this morning, and that a suspect was in custody.
I'm finding it harder than normal to find sympathy for this murder victim, but with reason.
He was a man who killed babies the age my daughter Kate was when she came into this world. To me putting a baby to death is simply unimaginable and tragic, and it makes him a monster. I cannot imagine the kind of man who would do such a thing, or easily imagine the circumstances in which such an act could be justified if the baby wasn't an immediate and life-threatening medical risk to the mother, but I do try to remind myself that it isn't my place to judge what happens to him, or his soul.
If you believe in God, you know that either Tiller is forgiven for his sins, or he is damned for eternity.
Sadly, there are some small-minded people who find a bit of satisfaction in the thought of an abortion doctor burning in Hell, and think that the only think wrong with this scenario is that the other few doctors nationwide that still practice this barbarity aren't also in morgues.
I don't think they grasp that the murder of this physician is merely the last tragedy of a life tragically led, and that politically-motivated murders rarely accomplish anything more than throwing away two more lives (that of the the victim and the murderer) without coming a single step closer to resolving the underlying disconnect that leaves the sides so far apart.
George Tiller was a monster. So is his killer. Neither should be made into martyrs or heroes, as it is quite clear that neither man was.
Simply pray they both find forgiveness, and hope that when our final day arrives, we find forgiveness as well.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
04:54 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 359 words, total size 2 kb.
May 18, 2009
May 11, 2009
Tomorrow Belongs to Meh
In the interest of "going Galt" I've done away with my spellchecker. From now on, all typos are to now to be considered subversive activities.
Someone infomr DHS.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
07:37 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 36 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Mike at May 13, 2009 12:53 PM (8zaZ2)
Posted by: pula at May 14, 2009 09:54 AM (gEQAW)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 22, 2009
Tarheel Fascism
6 people, presumably students,
have been arrested protesting Virgil Goode's speech against illegal immigration at UNC-Chapel Hill. They seem to be every bit as tolerant as the Carolina blue fascists that violently ended Tom Tancredo's attempted speech last week.
The Daily Tarheel covered the speech via Twitter, and described juvenile protesters that simply don't understand that the freedom of speech hinges on the free exchange of ideas, not drowning out those that oppose your own.
It's a sad commentary on the state of education and intellectual discourse at Chapel Hill, but sadly a kind of intellectual bullying that has become a favored tactic on the political left.
A protestor at the Tancredo event sums up the thuggish behavior with daring honesty when she admitted, "I don't believe a lot of change in this country have come through debating and being happy and talking to people."
Presumably one day in the future this protestor or another one like her will brag about having the university with the cleanest-burning ovens.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:42 PM
| Comments (25)
| Add Comment
Post contains 172 words, total size 1 kb.
1
I went to college there...and this is nothing new. Waking up in Old West to protests at the Chancellors office was just how I liked to spend my mornings too...
taxsong.com
Posted by: TBW at April 22, 2009 10:21 PM (iYKSb)
2
So..when do we push back?
Posted by: Cow Rie at April 22, 2009 10:51 PM (3lMDb)
3
That's the hard question; their vile and noxious behavior is intrinsic and derived from their sick worldview just like the anarchists who protest world economic summits; illegality comes naturally to them ... they are scum-punks.
The time to push back is in November; perhaps candidates should run advocating harsh Federal penalties for inteferring with free speech.
The alternative is so show up and fight back; I dream of it, but don't want to do it.
Maybe derive some satisfaction in that these idiots are using their youths for these activities and this worldview; they will suffer statistically and over time for their depravity and predations.
Tancredo is a really cool guy; I heard him speak in a very casual setting in February.
TMD
Posted by: The Masked Defender at April 22, 2009 11:12 PM (2LPPA)
4
We had a similar situation at UTexas/Austin two weeks ago when David Horowitz tried to speak. A gang of some 20 thugs shouted him down, refused to let him be heard, for about 20 long minutes while a large crowd waited. Finally, university authorities threatened the leftists with arrest, and things quieted down.
Believe me, if protestors were interrupting a UT football game, they would have been grabbed and expelled from the premises within a few seconds. It wouldn't have taken 20-25 minutes.
Posted by: Robert concord at April 22, 2009 11:20 PM (H6hvs)
5
As a history major, I took a class on Cuban history, taught by a one Perez. The guy was an extremely charismatic lecturer but with a straight face, tried to defend Castro and cited a 99% literacy rate, equal healthcare, etc, among other outrageously inaccurate claims... his speeches on the exploits of the daring Castro revolution were singed into the minds of his students.. most Chapel Hill kids start left and move leftward.. it helps your grades as well. Writing a solid conservative paper will earn you a C-bomb in no time.
Posted by: USMC guy at April 22, 2009 11:23 PM (1hPpH)
6
It's the same with gay marriage, global warming, and all other kinds of issues. You go to bed to a debate and wake up to a "settled matter." Take the "wrong" side and the VLWC treats you as if you'd just said the world is flat - except that they'd actually be tolerant of anyone who said that.
Posted by: Chris Roberts at April 22, 2009 11:30 PM (kYSVV)
7
One way to "push back" is to find out the names of the faculty members involved and then publicize their involvement.
Another way to "push back" is to find smart people who know how to discredit people and then have them ask the other side (broadly construed) questions on video for Youtube:
http://24ahead.com/s/question-authority
So, if you're a college student and someone who doesn't support enforcement of our laws is coming to your campus, instead of standing around outside with loopy signs, go inside and ask the speaker a question designed to make them look bad. Then, upload their response to Youtube.
Posted by: 24AheadDotCom at April 22, 2009 11:33 PM (CmcMj)
8
For libertarian reasons, I'm a free immigration, open-borders advocate. I believe that--all else being equal--people should be allowed to travel where they want, contract freely for goods and services, and live freely on property that they've bought, leased or have been invited on. I don't believe basic concepts of "liberty", "due process" and "free markets" should be limited to imaginary lines drawn on a map of North America 180 years ago. Our current immigration system is a Kafkaesque nightmare that makes "legal immigration" impossible and creates a servant caste out of immigrants who have attempted to do so in good faith. The tough talk on immigration from otherwise respectable conservative politicians and pundits would stop quickly if they've seen what I have: Immigration detention centers that resemble concentration camps, full of detainees imprisoned first with questions asked later, without right to counsel, with a 1-2 day notice of the most important trial of the lives; spouses and families broken apart, jobs and contracts fallen through, victims of female genital mutilation sent back to 3rd world hellholes because of paperwork screwups 10 years ago, children brought across the border by their parents who grow up without any citizen papers and end up literally as "people without a country". etc., etc.
That being said, these protest were despicable, puerile and narcissistic. You don't change anything (or at least anything for the better) by terrorizing and shouting down people. There are principled, reasoned arguments that can be made effectively on this issue to the people who matter. But they can't be made if you're going to behave like Code Pink wackos with some half-assed ideas of what civil disobedience means or entails.
The moral of this story is what happens when the hard left--or other wacko, fringe elements--are allowed to claim a side in a debate as their own. What should've been protesting turns into rioting. What should've been op-ed columns and blog articles turns into stupid one-liner banner slogans. What should've been appeals to the better angels of our nature turns into screaming accusations of ordinary citizens being fascists and racists.
Posted by: TheAbstractor at April 22, 2009 11:39 PM (cuj5b)
9
For libertarian reasons, I'm a free immigration, open-borders advocate. I believe that--all else being equal--people should be allowed to travel where they want, contract freely for goods and services, and live freely on property that they've bought, leased or have been invited on. I don't believe basic concepts of "liberty", "due process" and "free markets" should be limited to imaginary lines drawn on a map of North America 180 years ago. Our current immigration system is a Kafkaesque nightmare that makes "legal immigration" impossible and creates a servant caste out of immigrants who have attempted to do so in good faith. The tough talk on immigration from otherwise respectable conservative politicians and pundits would stop quickly if they've seen what I have: Immigration detention centers that resemble concentration camps, full of detainees held without any idea of their court date, without right to counsel, with a 1-2 day notice of the most important trial of the lives, spouses and families broken apart, jobs and contracts fallen through, victims of female genital mutilation sent back to 3rd world hellholes because of a paperwork screwups 10 years ago, children brought across the border by their parents who grow up without any citizen papers and end up literally as "people without a country". etc., etc.
That being said, these protest were despicable, puerile and narcissistic. You don't change anything (or at least anything for the better) by terrorizing and shouting down people. There are principled, reasoned arguments that can be made effectively on this issue to the people who matter. But they can't be made if you're going to behave like some Code Pink wackos with some half-assed ideas of what civil disobedience means or entails.
The moral of this story is what happens when the hard left--or other wacko, fringe elements--are allowed to claim a side in a debate as their own. What should've been protesting turns into rioting. What should've been op-ed columns and blog articles turns into stupid one-liner banner slogans. What should've been appeals to the better angels of our nature turns into screaming accusations of sub-human activity.
Posted by: TheAbstractor at April 22, 2009 11:40 PM (cuj5b)
10
If you are a thinking human being, cancel your print media and cable TV to take away the MSM megaphone and their propaganda.
Visit conservative group and "push back" by sticking together in numbers wherever you go whenever you can and promote YOUR CAUSE over the leftists. Don't be defeated.
Visit your school political meetings and VOICE your opinions at their councils.
Join conservative and moral groups.
"He that lives on HOPE will die fasting."
B. Franklin
Posted by: yyysguy at April 23, 2009 12:02 AM (MGDtq)
11
So what do you do?
Stop hiring leftists, stop doing business with leftists, stop buying from leftists, stop hanging around leftists. Let them believe whatever they wish - just don't support them.
Posted by: jimobr at April 23, 2009 01:27 AM (YgjLI)
12
not good. simply not good.
Posted by: Paul A'Barge at April 23, 2009 01:52 AM (s/VrA)
13
It's worse than you think. A lot of students, particularly the smart ones at the big universities learn quickly from these types of displays that their opinions, if contra the default far left one, are not welcome and in fact will be shouted down. It's not only a form of bullying that stops conservative participation in college, but conditions students for later life to just go along to get along in the political arena.
Until people who love liberty stand up and face down the bullies, the universities will continue to use taxpayer funds to run a nursery for leftist radicals and the socialist politicians.
Posted by: K at April 23, 2009 02:04 AM (ESyOe)
14
Dear Abstractor,
I have been a Libertarian since the party was formed. You are missing a point. As long as our freedom is impaired by the tax-and-buy-votes policies of the thugs in DC, we cannot have open borders because it puts us in deeper tax-slavery to those that wish to be our political masters. We need to get our house in order before we throw away the locks.
Posted by: Richard Roark at April 23, 2009 02:04 AM (m115B)
15
The most effective way to push back is to bust some agitator heads so they'll get the message.
Posted by: sestamibi at April 23, 2009 02:27 AM (UFNnW)
16
I like The Masked Defender's idea: Harsh penalties for people who interfere with others' right to free speech.
Posted by: Evil Pundit at April 23, 2009 04:18 AM (lYXvT)
17
The place reminds of the fictional college in the movie, PCU
Posted by: HarrisonS at April 23, 2009 08:05 AM (yapiR)
18
"... cleanest burning ovens." A wicked acute remark, perfectly capturing the spirit of "The World Without Us", the tenor of Enviroreichsminister Goreing, the actions of ALF and abortionists, and all else who hate human beings so.
Brilliant, Yankee!
Posted by: ALEXISTAN at April 23, 2009 09:18 AM (EWEg2)
19
Nothing new... when my dad was finishing his 45-year career as a history prof at a large US research university in the late '90s he lamented that exactly this sort of culture had developed among liberal arts students and faculty after the late '60s antiwar protests. The politicization of liberal arts via grievance departments (Afro, Chicano and Womyn's Studies were his '70s favorites) and the rise of Colleges of Education within universities further hastened the decline.
His generation prided itself on leaving their personal politics out of the classroom. That ethic is unheard of today.
The solution? Take my dad's advice to my brothers and me... any intelligent young person can read the canon and educate himself. The tools at his disposal today (CDs of great lecturers, etc...) make it even easier than when I was a student 20 years ago. However, it's nearly impossible for a poly sci major to pick up Tipler's Physics or even a fundamental calculus text and teach it to himself. Even the CDs of great lectures can only impart a superficial qualitative understanding of math and science.
Steer your children toward studying mathematics, hard science and engineering at university. Guide them throughout their adolescence and college years in individual study of the classics, humanities and art history in order to become educated in the arts and literature. In that way they'll truly be educated and able to function in our society. And they'll have an even greater competitive edge on arts grads.
I cringe on behalf of undergrads such as those at UNC when I hear today's young adults, allegedly educated at elite unis, spew gibberish and fail to understand how easily we can demolish arguments formed in environments in which students and faculty simply rebreathe their own fetid exhalation. At the age of 43 I do it as sport; it's both personal entertainment and a noble public service.
Posted by: Andrew at April 23, 2009 09:42 AM (JSVX+)
20
Hey, easy everyone with the "students and faculty" accusations. These were a handful of punk students who clearly have a left wing axe to grind. You can find kids like this on most campuses. But we should be clear that the UNC faculty is NOT in support of such behavior (even if some of their political views agree).
I am an alum who has never received any mail from UNC that wasn't a solicitation for donations. So I was shocked to receive THIS apology from the Chancellor after the Trancredo Incident:
"I want to express how disappointed I am in what happened last night when former Congressman Tom Tancredo wasn't able to speak when a protest got out of hand, and our Department of Public Safety had to take action...(clipped)...On behalf of our University community, I called Mr. Tancredo today to apologize for how he was treated. In addition, our Department of Public Safety is investigating this incident. They will pursue criminal charges if any are warranted. Our Division of Student Affairs is also investigating student involvement in the protest. If that investigation determines sufficient evidence, participating students could face Honor Court proceedings....Carolina's tradition of free speech is a fundamental part of what has made this place special for more than 200 years. Let's recommit ourselves to that ideal."
The following incident resulted in the arrests of six punks, who are now also probably facing Honor Court charges and likely suspension if not expulsion from UNC.
The UNC "faculty" and administration is handling this in an appropriate way.
Go Heels!
Posted by: Blue Heaven 1 at April 23, 2009 10:47 AM (+KXmZ)
21
I was extremely disappointed in the coverage by News 14 yesterday. They called Goode a "right winger," which simply shows there massive left wing bias. And stated tat Tancredo was against immigration, not illegal immigration. Shockingly, when I wrote them, they did not respond. Go figure.
Posted by: William Teach at April 23, 2009 11:11 AM (7yTel)
22
A protestor at the Tancredo event sums up the thuggish behavior with daring honesty when she admitted, "I don't believe a lot of change in this country have come through debating and being happy and talking to people."
And yet, that's our new foreign policy.
William Teach, Tanc is opposed to much legal immigration. He offered a moratorium bill while in Congress.
Posted by: Pablo at April 23, 2009 11:58 AM (yTndK)
23
I would remind "Blue Heaven 1" that talk is cheap, and Chancellors are well paid to speak at length. It is the actions that his administration takes that will determine whether or not the civil rights of future speakers, and their listeners, will be supported or transgressed.
As long as the perception exists that his administration permits or condones such behavior as we have witnessed in these two incidents (and, I must admit that it would seem that these are only the visible tips of the proverbial ice-berg), then a regime of thuggery will prevail at UNC, and at other institutions of "higher learning" that do likewise.
Posted by: AD at April 23, 2009 12:49 PM (S+QWU)
24
At least he was able to do his speech without those miserble brown shirts trying to stop him with their usial thuggish tacists
Posted by: Flu-Bird at April 24, 2009 10:55 AM (A/2W8)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Happy Poisoned Piven Day
Pseudo-environmentalists are celebrating Earth Day today, a day "a day designed to inspire awareness and appreciation for the Earth's environment."
Uh-huh.
My company is celebrating Earth Day by passing out compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) light bulbs to all employees. As you may imagine, I am absolutely thrilled that they are attempting to introduce fragile glass tubes containing poisonous heavy metals into my home. After all, mercury worked so well for Jeremy.
Like Doctor Sanity, I see Earth Day for what it is, a political machination more than an environmental one, and so I'm hardly surprised to see President Obama burn thousands of gallons of jet fuel to take a junket to give a short speech in Iowa supporting his plan to wreck capitalism with a so-called "green economy" that will cost American jobs and cause fuel prices to soar for all Americans during a down market without actually benefiting the biosphere.
Today is Earth Day, they tell me. Today I should appreciate the environment.
Maybe it's simply a sign of how I was raised, but pretty much every day is Earth Day. We cut off the lights when we leave a room. With the exception of the baby, we take showers instead of baths. We grow some of our own vegetables and spices, and hand weed and use organic remedies to minimize pests instead of using chemicals. Given more time, I'd even provide more "green" meat for my family, hunting and fishing to harvest those other meaty emitters of greenhouse gasses and biowaste for the children!
But Earth Day isn't about protecting the Earth for many of those involved. It's about regulating and controlling people, especially people that they find objectionable.
Thanks, but I'll pass.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:23 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 293 words, total size 2 kb.
1
Happy Lenin's Birthday!
Posted by: Cargosquid at April 22, 2009 12:28 PM (ESUIi)
2
I work at the EPA campus in RTP, NC. Earth Day is celebrated here with as much solemnity as an Easter vigil at my church. If the tree huggers I work with weren't so scary, it would be funny.
Posted by: TarHeel Repub at April 22, 2009 12:41 PM (NPzE8)
3
The amount of mercury in one of those CFLs is not a problem unless you try to inhale it. Well, I'd recommend opening a window, and throwing them away in an outside trashcan. Seriously, how often do you break a lightbulb?
I'm an environmentalist myself, but I am conservative. I use CFLs to save money mostly. I remain convinced Al Gore doesn't believe in global warming, nor do most environmental groups. When you hear Greenpeace say something like "Nuclear plants are bad, but I'd rather use nukes than flood the world", call me.
Posted by: OmegaPaladin at April 22, 2009 01:21 PM (U/ACJ)
4
I just got my earth day present from thompson cigar and I am going out on My new wood deckand light up a stogy!!!
Posted by: Rich in KC at April 22, 2009 02:40 PM (siQqy)
5
I am an avid gardener but I am sooooo sick of "green" I want to puke. I can't stand this EC crap anymore.
Posted by: mbabbitt at April 23, 2009 12:45 AM (AbEun)
6
Stopping the use of aerosols in hairspray was a ood thing because it stopped the "hole in the ozone layer" from growing.
Which was a bad thing, because as it "heals" Antactica gets colder - causing Western Antarctican ice to break (ice is brittle) and eastern Antarctica to build up ice - and going against the "The Earth Is Burnung Up" meme.
Lessening atmospheric particulate-matter pollution is a good thing.
Except it is a bad thing, as it encourages plants to take more CO2 out of the atmosphere. Silly nature, doesn't it know only humans are supposed to control CO2?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/5202877/Global-warming-slowed-by-pollution.html
Posted by: teqjack at April 23, 2009 02:05 PM (CEphM)
7
There's a company in RTP that makes LED lights. Less power consumption and no mercury.
'Course they're a bit on the expensive side at 50 bucks a pop.
Posted by: Larry at April 26, 2009 02:45 AM (v9zij)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
March 20, 2009
Raleigh, NC Tax Day Tea Party
I guess late is better than never, so here's notice that there will be a tea party protest at the State Capitol in Raleigh, NC on Saturday, March 21.
Raleigh will also be one of the sites for a nationwide tea party on April 15.
You can find out more about both events at RaleighTeaParty.com
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:40 PM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 67 words, total size 1 kb.
108kb generated in CPU 0.0275, elapsed 0.1148 seconds.
68 queries taking 0.0966 seconds, 279 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.