No Greater Joy Than Murdering a Child
Here in North Carolina, a sick story has been
developing about a woman that
murdered her adopted 4-year-old son last month and beat two others with lengths of plumbing pipe. Most of us would prefer to think of the murder of Sean Paddock as the depraved act of an isolated psychopath. But Lynn Paddock, now
charged with first-degree murder and possibly facing the death penalty, did not come to such acts of brutality without guidance.
No, Lynn Paddock got her ideas on how to discipline her children from the web site and books of an evangelical minister and his wife that advocate something that certainly sounds like child abuse.
From the Raleigh News & Observer:
Paddock -- a Johnston County mother accused of murdering Sean, her 4-year-old adopted son, and beating two other adopted children -- surfed the Internet, said her attorney, Michael Reece. She found literature by an evangelical minister and his wife who recommended using plumbing supply lines to spank misbehaving children.
Paddock ordered Michael and Debi Pearl's books and started spanking her adopted children as suggested. After Sean, the youngest of Paddock's six adopted children, died last month, his older sister and brother told investigators about Paddock's spankings.
Sean's 9-year-old brother was beaten so badly he limped, a prosecutor said. Bruises marred Sean's backside, too, doctors found.
Sean died after being wrapped so tightly in blankets he suffocated. That, too, was a form of punishment, Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell said.
The Pearls' advice from their Web site: A swift whack with the plastic tubing would sting but not bruise. Give 10 licks at a time, more if the child resists. Be careful about using it in front of others -- even at church; nosy neighbors might call social workers. Save hands for nurturing, not disciplining. Heed the warning, taken from Proverbs in the Old Testament, that sparing the rod will spoil the child.
The Pearls' website No GreaterJoy.org does indeed condone the "advice" such as that above, which most sane people would consider not only outright child abuse, but an acknowledgement that is could invite investigation if used "in front of others." Of "¼ inch supply line" they state, "It's a real attention-getter."
I am no opponent of corporal punishment. I got spankings as a kid when I deserved them, I earned every one, and avoided a few I deserved. But there is no "fine line" between discipline and beatings worse than we'd allow any al Qaeda POW to suffer.
Michael and Debi Pearl seem to be advocates of outright child abuse, calling on parents to hit children with PVC pipe no less than ten times, and "more if the child resists", as the News & Observer reports.
The Pearls have a Contact page on their web site. I suggest you use it, and politely tell them you do not condone the beating of children with construction products.
Better yet, contact:
Honorable Ronald L. Davis
District Attorney General
Williamson County Courthouse, G-8
P.O. Box 937
Franklin, TN 37065-0937
Phone: (615) 794-7275
Fax: (615) 794-7299
Mr. Davis is up for re-election in the Williamson County Republican Primary Election for the 21st District on May 2, 2006. While Mr. Pearl is running unopposed in the primary, I'm sure that his electorate would like to know why the Pearls have been allowed to sell more than 400,00 copies of a book advocating what sounds like child abuse under his very nose.
Also contact the newsroom at the Nashville Tennessean , at newstips@tennessean.com and ask them why this has been allowed to go on in Williamson County.
"Suffer the little children," no more.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:58 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 617 words, total size 4 kb.
1
There are an endless number of groups that say they are Christian that do not follow the precepts of Christianity. Violence of any kind is not one of those precepts. But whatever, the excuse that I got my murderous ideas from web sites, movies, books, etc. is a total copout that does not sell here or in Peoria.
Posted by: docdaved at March 17, 2006 05:36 PM (WoNKA)
2
I looked at that website some time ago and wasn't impressed however I don't think you should make a "child abuse" call based on the type of switch, but rather the method of application. Children have been beaten to death and horribly injured with "normal" instruments of correction that warmed my bottom growing up, like belts, razor straps, switches cut from bushes, bare hands, etc. As for the 'don't use in front of others' comment, I was "advised" of that the first time I swatted my godaughter on the behind in public for showing out with my bare hand twentyish years ago and have been "advised" about with my 14 month old son (who incidently isn't old enough for spankings yet). Too much Doctor Spock BS. More telling would be the comment you listed that the switch in question should "sting but not bruise" which represents excellent advice for any corporal punishment of children.
Posted by: kamatu at March 19, 2006 12:59 AM (CzVHR)
3
"Spare the rod, spoil the child" may be the most misunderstood, misused and misapplied passage in the entire Bible. It is a reference to the pastoral nature of the faith, which Jesus would later adopt as part of his ministry, and related to the idea of "the lord is my shepherd." The rod in question is the shepherd's staff (with the crooked end) with which the shepherd guides the sheep and keeps the flock together. The shepherd doesn't use it to hit the sheep, nor does this proverb advocate or justify beating children - it's about guidance. Whenever I hear someone use this passage to excuse corporal punishment, I know I am in the presence of a religious illiterate of the most primitive sort.
Posted by: Mark Tomeo at March 20, 2006 11:19 AM (DrtgT)
4
My own feelings about the Pearls are mixed, as IÂ’ve written on other boards. No, I donÂ’t agree with all their disciplinary methods (ex. setting a child up to fail by tempting him or her with an object). However, it is clear that the method by which this young boy died (suffocating while being wrapped in a blanket) was NOT advocated by the Pearls anywhere. Blaming the Pearls for his death is like blaming Jesus for the Crusades because the people who carried them out called themselves Christians. Likewise, while IÂ’m no fan of Karl Marx, I donÂ’t think he can be personally blamed for the atrocities committed by Communist regimes.
You may be different from them, but many anti-Pearlites are against ANY form of corporal punishment. And they're using this tragedy to push their own agenda.
Posted by: Emily Liz at March 20, 2006 04:50 PM (fOyx5)
5
Stop the madness and join the boycott. Click on my blog.
Posted by: Doc at March 21, 2006 01:05 AM (HuS7Q)
6
I live in Williamson County and am part of a boycott against the Pearls' baby beating books and website.
It's saddening that we live in a world where if you hit another adult with a piece of plumbing supply line it is considered assault; but to hit a child with it is considered "training."
I will be writing a letters today.
Posted by: BridgetJ at March 21, 2006 10:05 AM (boWmh)
7
>>>"Spare the rod, spoil the child" may be the most misunderstood, misused and misapplied passage in the entire Bible....The rod in question is the shepherd's staff (with the crooked end) with which the shepherd guides the sheep and keeps the flock together. The shepherd doesn't use it to hit the sheep, nor does this proverb advocate or justify beating children - it's about guidance. Whenever I hear someone use this passage to excuse corporal punishment, I know I am in the presence of a religious illiterate of the most primitive sort.
I don't believe in child abuse and do not feel the Bible advocates it either (look at the WHOLE picture people), BUT---if you are going to state what the Bible says about something, the least you can be is completely accurate. You might want to open your Bible again Mark. You are clearly the one who is Bible illiterate. The rod is clearly not for guidance only. And yes, shepherds do/did hit their sheep with the rod. They can be some very stubborn, strong willed animals who need a whack on the backside to keep them from stumbling into life or death situations. I am a farmer and have done my homework on animal husbandry methods throughout the centuries. You might want to dig a little deeper and do your own research instead of reading what someone else claims is true.
Prov:10:13: In the lips of him that hath understanding wisdom is found: but a rod is for the **back of him** that is void of understanding.
Psalm23:13-14 Withhold not correction from the child: for if thou **beatest him with the rod**, he shall not die.Thou shalt **beat him with the rod**, and shalt deliver his soul from hell.
Again, I don't advocate child abuse, but let's get our facts about what the Bible does say straight.
Posted by: momof8 at June 18, 2006 12:14 AM (mzZmZ)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Strategery Babies
We went to my hometown today to meet the
newest member of my family today, and I was tickled at not only how cute he was, but how quickly
Phin adapted to the "Mr. Mom" role as the new mom recovered from her ordeal. He looked like he'd been raising kids all his life. Color me impressed.
We also found out that my new nephew willl only be the newest baby in the family for about seven months. My other brother and his wife revealed tonight they are expecting in early October.
It's all part of a Rovian plot, of course.
We don't only out-think liberals, we out-breed them as well.
That's strategery, baby.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:04 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 118 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Are you familiar with the theory of outbreeding conservatives dubbed the Roe effect? (Due credit to James Taranto of WSJ's Opinion Journal.) The theory goes that Roe v. Wade has had the indirect effect of making this country more conservative by legalizing abortion. Liberal women are more likely to abort than conservative women, and people tend to grow up with the political inclinations of their parents.
Even if you point out that the aborting women may end up having just as many kids, only later in life when more mature/financially stable/married, all of those factors contribute to people becoming more conservative over time, so that the woman ends up having her kids when she is much more conservative than she was when she aborted.
If that is true though, than both liberals' effort to protect and de-stigmatize abortion and conservatives' effort to ban it are pretty poor strategeries from a purely demographic standpoint.
Oh, and congratz to your family!
Posted by: Amber at March 15, 2006 02:14 AM (9uWiP)
2
I realized too late my first sentence contained a grammatical ambiguity: conservatives are outbreeding, and that was meant as an adjective, not a verb which would have flopped the meaning. Eh, it's 2am here what can I say.
Posted by: Amber at March 15, 2006 02:23 AM (9uWiP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Carolina Crusher
Is someone is taking tomorrow night's Duke-Carolina basketball game just a
bit too seriously?
Shocked UNC students watched in disbelief around noon Friday as an SUV plowed through a crowd at The Pit, the central gathering place, injuring at least two students.
Several students said the driver was young and wearing a dark suit and tie and they said he intentionally swerved to hit people.
The driver fled but was arrested soon after by Chapel Hill Police. His name was not immediately available.
Classes had just changed and The Pit was crowded. Witnesses said the SUV was going at least 40 miles per hour as it passed Lenoir Dining Hall. The condition of those injured was not immediately available.
All kidding about the intense Duke-Carolina rivalry aside, I have it on expert authority that the SUV was a rental vehicle picked up last night from a central North Carolina rental car company. If it was picked up for use as a weapon, atttepted murder charges would seem plausible.
Update: The 23-year-old driver has been identified as Mohammed Reza Taheriazar, which the News and Observer identifies as being a UNC-Chapel Hill student as late as last year.
In what could be an unrelated event, the Daily Tar Heel joined the Cartoon Wars, running this editorial cartoon February 9:
None of the staff of the Daily Tar Heel were among the injured, however, and a motive had not been announced.
Update 2:Terrorism confirmed
ABC11:
The driver of an SUV that plowed into a group of pedestrians at UNC-Chapel Hill on Friday told police it was retribution for the treatment of Muslims around the world, according to ABC News.
It appears to be an isolated incident. Also, the Duke-Carolina game is Saturday night, not tonight.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
02:25 PM
| Comments (14)
| Add Comment
Post contains 296 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: TallDave at March 03, 2006 04:38 PM (M0J/c)
2
I heard about the "accident" on WRAL on my way to work this afternoon. (It was still being called an accident at that time.)
I suppose one need not have an airplane or explosives to be a terrorist.
Posted by: Russ at March 03, 2006 04:59 PM (8Wes/)
3
Oops... I meant WPTF, not WRAL.
Posted by: Russ at March 03, 2006 06:00 PM (8Wes/)
4
Sounds like a little personal jihad to me. But what do I know; I'm a lowly infidel.
Posted by: foreign devil at March 03, 2006 06:50 PM (57Faw)
5
So instead of joining the military so he could go kill terrorists or Saddam who have been mass murdering Muslims for years, this guy decides to try to kill UNC students as a way to avenge the treatment of Muslims throughout the world. And these people wonder why Western Civilization has passed them by with "logical" thinking such as that. *rolling my eyes*
Posted by: Michael in MI at March 03, 2006 08:54 PM (GANmF)
6
I wonder if the suicidally naive apologists for Islam will stop to think about the fact that this was a group of students at one of the most liberal colleges in the southeast... This idiot was emboldened by the apparently limp reaction to worldwide jihad. We all need to stand together to defeat islamofascism. Divided we fall.
Posted by: Jeff in NC at March 03, 2006 09:30 PM (eyC/N)
7
Islamofascists kill other Muslims and this idiot is going to try and kill kids that more than likely never even voted for Bush? Thank God he was inept. Throw the book at him!
Posted by: Mark at March 03, 2006 10:04 PM (g1M0U)
Posted by: josh at March 03, 2006 10:23 PM (MGRcs)
9
WHen I heard about this on the news at the mosque I dropped my BLT knocked over my beer and it spilled all over my porno mag.
Posted by: Akmed at March 03, 2006 10:41 PM (y+1sY)
Posted by: rtp911help at March 04, 2006 10:14 AM (wYdB3)
11
Imagine if I, a Christian, had tried this act in the old Afghanistan or Saddam's Iraq,who amoung us feels I would survive. I wonder if the ACLU would come to my defense.
Mark
Las Vegas
Posted by: Mark at March 04, 2006 10:55 AM (BJYNn)
12
Apparently, this kid didn't get the memo about how Muslims are temporarily using American liberals to further their agenda.
You know, if he'd spent more time with the Muslim student organization he would know these things!
Posted by: Cate at March 04, 2006 01:59 PM (q/X8e)
13
So, how did he get a social security number? He is from Iran, right? Now that he has graduated, isn't it time for him to go home? Wonder what he majored in? Why are Iranian students (?) still in this country?
Posted by: Cowgirl at March 05, 2006 09:05 AM (HNE9b)
14
It's amazing to me that, while looking up this jerk's phone number, that there has not been a phone number or address for Mohammed Reza Taheriazar in the greater Raleigh/Durham area for the past two years. Makes you wonder, don't it?
Posted by: David at May 05, 2006 12:20 AM (r5/7C)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
33kb generated in CPU 0.0171, elapsed 0.1134 seconds.
54 queries taking 0.1023 seconds, 163 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.