January 28, 2008
Truth in Gaza
Hard to find.
Harder to get printed.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
11:26 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 13 words, total size 1 kb.
1
And
more.
Although Gaza daily requires 680,000 tons of flour to feed its population, Israel had cut this to 90 tons per day by November 2007, a reduction of 99 percent.
You don't need to be a math genius to figure out that if Gaza has a population of 1.5 million, as the authors also note, then 680,000 tons of flour a day come out to almost half a ton of flour per Gazan, per day.
A typographical error at the Boston Globe? Hardly. The two authors used the same "statistic" in an earlier piece. They copied it from an article published in the Ahram Weekly last November, which reported that "the price of a bag of flour has risen 80 per cent, because of the 680,000 tonnes the Gaza Strip needs daily, only 90 tonnes are permitted to enter." Sarraj and Roy added the bit about this being "a reduction of 99 percent."
Posted by: Pablo at January 29, 2008 12:25 AM (yTndK)
2
But, Pablo, you don't understand that The Truth is whatever The Media says it is, because The Media is part of The Elite, and The Elite have to tell the stupid masses what The Truth is.
So, if The Elite say that The Truth is that Iraq is still a quagmire, that the surge has failed, and that Boooooosh steered Katrina to hit New Orleans, the job of the stupid masses is just to accept that, without question.
/sarc
Posted by: C-C-G at January 29, 2008 09:37 AM (HVE86)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 24, 2008
January 17, 2008
At PJM: The New York Times Hits Veterans Yet Again
Did you read the
article at the
New York Times this past Sunday about the astronomical homicide rates among veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan?
If you didn't, Samantha Sault captured a nice roundup of earlier blog reaction, which discovered that the Times left out key statistics in order to complete their smear.
It only gets worse from there.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:31 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 78 words, total size 1 kb.
1
In Cincinnati, Ohio, an Operation Iraqi Freedom veteran Jason Roach is being excessively charged with voluntary manslaughter and murder for the death of Kelly Douglass. At this time, he is being held in jail on $500k bond. Kelly was a friend and a co-worker of both Jason and his wife Misty. There were allegations of an affair between Kelly and Misty, which are still unclear at this time. Kelly wanted to come to their home to discuss the situation with Jason. Jason and Misty told Kelly not to come to the house but refused and came to the house, which is when an argument broke out and Jason told him to leave. A scuffle ensued and while they were fighting, Kelly slipped on a patch of ice causing him to fall and hit his head on the ground, which is when Kelly went unconscious. Immediately Jason started screaming for help and called 911.
The media has made Jason appear as a deranged veteran who savagely beat Kelly to death. Some reporters want to know more than just what they have to print. Others could not care less and as long as they make their deadline, they do not have to worry about what the rest of the story is. In this case, if it was a savage beating then why did Jason attempt to drag Kelly out of the road in order to avoid getting hit by a car? Secondly, he tried to get Kelly in to his vehicle to take him to the hospital because the ambulance was taking too long. Does that sound like Jason savagely beat him to death?
What has been left out in the media is the fact that Kelly came to the house with a cache of weapons that included a loaded gun bought the day prior, which he was not registered to carry and conceal. If the he had not died, I am sure the tables would be turned and it would be Kelly in jail for felony weapon possession along with aggravated assault and battery.
No one is saying a crime should go unpunished, but what is right, what is just, is to know what justice is. We will not do the right thing unless and until we actually look beyond what is right in front of our face and we stop treating combat veterans like they are uncaged animals that will attack at any given moment.
They are not like anyone else you know. They are rare in this nation and they are not "normal" which we should thank God for. Normal people are not willing to lay down their lives for someone else. Normal people are not willing to do what they do. Normal people do not have to see what they see on their own street because they are willing to go beyond normal. There is nothing normal about combat and it is high time the rest of us stopped thinking they are just like the rest of us. It is time that we stop the media from attacking the integrity of our nation's heroes.
Posted by: Johnny Waltz at January 17, 2008 08:49 AM (rLLsr)
2
Johnny Waltz' story is not the only distortion in the NYT 121 killings.
(NB: These are not murders they are deaths.)
The lead off case is Matthew Sepi, who was attacked and fired on by two armed men in an alley behind a convience store. Young Matthew pulled out an AK47, killed one and wounded the other.
Another vet found an armed man breaking into his car. In the confrontation, the robber was killed.
Another vet developed a taste for ether and had a fatal auto accident.
These incidents, tragic as they are, fall well short of murder.
This NYT article is just a rehash of the crazed Vietnam vet smears so popular in the 1970s. They were lies too.
Posted by: arch at January 17, 2008 09:41 AM (ccr5J)
3
If anyone is interested in apples to apples, the data are available on line. One error that many of the commenters are making is that 121 is over six years while murder rates are annual.
Since 2002, the US has averaged about 16,500 homicides per year for a rate of 6.5 to 5.5 per 100,000.
90% of all murders are committed by males who constitute only 49% of the population.
If these returning military vets are in the age range 20 to 34, that population commits 53.5% of all murders where offender's age is known.
The US Census estimates the 20 to 34 population at 20.9% of the total. (Males 10.24%.) The rate for 20-34 American males is 26 per 100,000.
I have found varying numbers of returned vets from 800,000 to 2,000,000. To build an accurate model, these data would need to be time phased from 2002 forward.
If we use the NYT numbers the rate would be 1 to 2.5 per 100,000, well below the 26 per 100,000 in the same demographic nationally.
The Times did another military hit piece
Posted by: arch at January 17, 2008 10:19 AM (ccr5J)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 11, 2008
At PJM: Assassinating Obama?
There have been quite a few articles written in the past week speculating that Democratic Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama might be assassinated by a shadowy cabal of gun-toting racists (or Halliburton and Blackwater).
In my latest Pajamas Media article, I trace that rumor back to it's true source, and find that that paranoia stems from the media's own stilted views of the American people.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:23 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 73 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Actually, Bob, I think this whole concept has to do with the leftover 60's hippies seeing Robert Kennedy in Obama. Therefore, since Kennedy was assassinated, Obama will be too.
Projection does weird things to people sometimes.
Posted by: C-C-G at January 11, 2008 09:35 AM (ojkss)
2
My manager said to me last night that she thought if Obama was elected he'd be assassinated. And she's not exactly political. Whoever is spreading this propaganda it's getting out to the people.
Posted by: Capitalist Infidel at January 11, 2008 10:09 AM (Lgw9b)
3
How silly.
He's a Chicago Politician, with all the corruption that implies. Just check how his house was financed. It will be a lot cheaper and easier to buy Barry Boy than to buy an assassin.
Posted by: GeorgeH at January 11, 2008 02:53 PM (chLFa)
4
Please, Bob, do not give our Philip Adams any more oxygen. He's a bloody antiquated embarrassment of an America-hating wanker and the kindest thing we could do, both for Mr Adams and Australia in general, is let him go gentle into that good night of the sheltered workshop which is our ABC.
Besides which, Malcolm X was assassinated by Black Muslims within the Nation of Islam, not by a "gun-toting [presumably white] racist." Not that Mr Adams ever lets the facts get in the way of a good Yank-bashing.
Slipping into Yoof Vernacular in a desperate grasp at relevance, Mr Adams asserts that Obama is "crazy brave." I assert that Mr Adams is "scary crazy."
Posted by: WestAussie at January 12, 2008 01:18 AM (7kFhO)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
January 04, 2008
Harper's Horton Scandals Heat Up
Horton Hears a Boo: Journalistic Hijinks at Harper's Exposed is now up at
Pajamas Media and has already been linked by both
Instapundit and
Powerline.
It turns out that Harper's writer Scott Horton, who has been a leading cheerleader for imprisoned Associated Press photographer and terrorism suspect Bilal Hussein, was a former investigator for Hussein's defense team, a disclosure that he has failed to make in his recent attacks against the U.S. military's handling of the Hussein case.
This particular bit of journalistic malpractice is unrelated to another budding scandal surrounding Horton's still unsupported August 24 claim that an unnamed "thuggish neocon" journalist fabricated a story while Horton was in Iraq.
Repeatedly pressed for comment and proof of the anonymous article Horton alludes to, Harper's Editor Roger D. Hodge, Managing Editor Ellen Rosenbush, Vice President of Public Relations Giulia Melucci and Horton have thus far refused to support or retract his claim. Hodge, Rosenbush, and Melucci were contacted as recently as December 30, but remain mute, apparently hoping to stonewall their way through this scandal.
In light of these developments, perhaps Andrew Sullivan may want to reconsider his statement that, "Scott Horton has as much integrity as anyone I know."
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:09 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 210 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"Scott Horton has as much integrity as anyone I know."
--Andrew Sullivan
Well, strictly speaking, Sullivan's words may be precisely the truth.
Posted by: Bill Smith at January 04, 2008 10:45 AM (WflwE)
2
Could Horton have been fabricating and debunking charges against Bilal in the safety of his own mind? With an apparent huge ego and need for publicity, that may be the case.
Scott Horton, super lawyer, patriot, human rights advocate, partisan hack jouralist extraordinaire badly in need of an ethics refresher.
Posted by: daleyrocks at January 04, 2008 11:00 AM (0pZel)
Posted by: Dusty at January 04, 2008 11:23 AM (GJLeQ)
4
Ooh! Ooh! Can I be the thuggish neocon?
Posted by: Peter at January 04, 2008 03:23 PM (AiJXe)
5
I agree with Bill's comment!
Posted by: Huntress at January 06, 2008 09:59 AM (SfNIo)
6
"Scott Horton has as much integrity as anyone I know."
That says more about Sullivan than Horton.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at January 06, 2008 10:41 PM (ERV3B)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
29kb generated in CPU 0.0516, elapsed 0.1116 seconds.
55 queries taking 0.0996 seconds, 129 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.