November 12, 2009
Are Iranian Weapons Flowing Through Your Country's Ports?
The 500 tons of Iranian rockets, grenades, ammunition and mortar shells that Israel intercepted on the
MV Francop was destined for Hezbollah terrorists in Lebanon, a fact that
Iran's friends in the Obama White House will not doubt seek to downplay if not outright ignore. That means that a media largely compliant to the Administration's wishes will fail to pick up on the alarm sounded by Israel, which noted the weapons they intercepted had first been shipped into an unsuspecting third country, unloaded, transferred, and shipped out again without anyone in that nation knowing.
The weapons were not segregated or controlled, were not properly stored or packed, and highly explosive.
And it could happen any any port at any nation on earth.
"When you deal with those containers without any precautions at all, they can explode almost anywhere. And any one of your ships could carry one of those containers one day, and any one of your ports could deal with those explosives."
This isn't a secret.
So why isn't anything being done about it?
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
09:18 AM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 191 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Start with the lack of security in most ports and add the tendency of most third-world customs inspectors to take bribes. Mix in total indifference to what is being shipped as long as the customs duties are paid. Top it off with traditional third-world indifference to the consequences of a container exploding and you have your answer.
Posted by: Mike at November 12, 2009 09:47 AM (7nc0l)
2
Lockheed Martin was working on a system dealing with container tracking and security for our ports, but I'm not sure of the status of the project. I also wasn't involved with it so I don't know the details of what exactly the system entailed.
However that doesn't help with 3rd world ports. The real scary thing is them getting a nuclear device on one of those ships and detonating it in one of our major ports.
Posted by: Scott at November 12, 2009 11:20 AM (6yHgW)
3
The casualness in which TCNs (third country nationals) handle high eplosives is enough to make any sane man run for cover. Even when they are TRAINED they're dangerous. I've personally seen TCNs throwing LIVE 120mm mortar rounds into a pile like so many logs. "InSh'Allah" is their watchword meaning "It's Gods Will" or "In Gods Hands" IF the stuff blows up.
Case in point: its symptomatic of Islam, this personal abrogation of personal responsibility. By claiming that everything is in "God Hands/Will" the individual in question never need feel, nor respect anyone, anything, or do anything other than what they themselves wish to do or impose on others because it's all up to God. This is why they run red lights in Kuwait (causing me a permanant limp) and don't strap their small children in car seats, or even throw load high explosives around with impunity. If God wants them to live, they will, InSh'Allah.
Posted by: Big Country at November 12, 2009 04:09 PM (H/RUP)
4
RE: Scott
It is not a matter of "getting a nuke on ONE" in a cargo container.
It's simply a matter of time, sufficient stockpile to detonate a half dozen with sufficient reserve stockpile to be credible with issuing threats and edicts, it will happen. 3-5 years.
Once they have accumulated sufficient stockpile to getting 5 or 6 in separate U.S. ports, stored say for a couple weeks to coordinate a simultaneous blast, plus another 5 or 6 in financial city centers, plus likely a couple on missiles aimed at Israel, the U.K. France and Germany,
Kaboom.
Visit the port of Long Beach sometime, the port of Oakland, the port of Houston and Baltimore.
Five years ago they Mullah thugocracy had their Pasdaran practice launching long range missiles from the holds of junk frieght ships in the Caspian. Guess what ? It works.
http://politicscentral.com/2006/10/24/ten_kilotons_and_the_port_of_l.php
Posted by: Econ_Scott at November 12, 2009 07:17 PM (kP2Fw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
November 10, 2009
November 09, 2009
Iranian Rockets Captured by Israel Identical to Rockets Fired At U.S. Bases in Iraq
107mm rockets of recent Iranian manufacture are among the 500 tons of ordnance recovered by the Israeli Navy, and the rockets they recovered precisely matched those captured outside of U.S FOB Hammer in
July of 2007.
And in case you are wondering, yes, those same rockets are still being used, and are still killing American soldiers today.
An American logistics contractor known to readers of this blog as "Big Country" says via email that those same rockets are still being used against American bases:
...between the hours of 2000 and 2200 (8pm to 10pm) drop, yep you guessed it, 107mm rockets on us. Some days they don't drop at all, which is even worse. The waiting ya know? The largest number was 6 in short order, and the lowest was a single one. Guess it depends on how confident they are about getting caught. One of them KIA'd a guy on the pad across from me a few weeks backÂ… 4 WIA, 1 KIA. (That one made FOXnews and CNN) I'm getting my intel firsthand on this, (it's pretty common knowledge on post) and the Army is fully aware of the whole thing, but whether or not it helps, I dunno... wheels within wheels as they say. I hope they put the zap these jokers soon.
Will President Obama man-up and stop Iran from supplying weapons being used against our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan, and against our allies and national interests? Or will he continue to pretend these weapons are not being used against Americans, so he can play at gutless diplomacy?
Somehow, I think we all know the answer.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
03:16 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I remember when Jack Cafferty on CNN said that he sees no problem with this.
Posted by: brando at November 09, 2009 03:48 PM (IPGju)
2
Seems to me that we did the same thing when the USSR had their Afghani misadventure. Soviets couldn't do anything about it then and I'm not sure there's much that we can do now, even if we did have something more substantial than the current Pretender-in-Chief in the Oval Office. Certainly the Iranians have shown little fear of us and next to none for D'Ohbama...
Posted by: Diogenes Online at November 09, 2009 04:01 PM (2MrBP)
3
CY - What an incredible coincidence!
Posted by: daleyrocks at November 09, 2009 06:22 PM (3O5/e)
4
If I were in charge, I would send boomer to that part of the world, Let the Iranians know it was there and then give them an ultimatum. Desist or ceast to exist.
Posted by: Zelsdorf Ragshaft III at November 09, 2009 06:25 PM (EqMUb)
5
I know we dont like it when they are aimed at us. Fact is Iran has just joined the arms game. US, China, Russia, France, Iran and others make weapons for export. There has been times when our soldiers were being shot at with US made arms.
Posted by: capt26thga at November 09, 2009 07:42 PM (h7WK1)
6
The point is, whether it is Iranian Shia or Al Queda Sunni or Syrian Baathists or Palestinian anti-zionists or Paki talibanophiles... all these distinctions give way to their common aim to wage what we may properly call Jihad. Sure, if they didn't have us or the Brits around to shoot at they would turn on each other; each claiming the next to be kaffir, they WILL work in common cause to blow up american GIs or civilians. The Lockerbie bomber is as much a hero to our domestic jihadists as he is to Bashar Assad, the Saddam-style secularist. This is the Unified Field Theory of Jihad and is what Bush Meant To Say when he coined the less inflammatory and less accurate GWOT.
Posted by: megapotamus at November 10, 2009 06:00 AM (wJMs3)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Thank Goodness fo "Cop-Killer" Weapons
For once, an anti-gun organization's spurious claims may have saved lives.
My latest article is up at Pajamas Media.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:37 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 29 words, total size 1 kb.
November 06, 2009
25kb generated in CPU 0.0172, elapsed 0.0917 seconds.
54 queries taking 0.082 seconds, 125 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.