1 Bob, normally I like everything you write, but I don't get this article at PJM. You conclude that we should be concentrating on what is really important: "political positions, his record, his philosophy on the role of government in our lives, and whether or not he has the experience, temperament, and judgment to be our president when compared against the probable Republican candidate..." while chastizing people for looking at Obama's heritage and history, as well as his actions. You don't think those things are all clues to his philosophy, temperament and judgment? Don't many of the things you cite give us a glimpse of Obama's political positions? Should we not be concerned that the persons usually considered to be the most influential in a man's life, his mother and his wife, both appear to be rabid anti-Americans, most especially his mother. Should we not be concerned how loyalties to a foreign country or culture might affect Obama's philosophy and political positions? We are trying to get a complete picture of a man who to date has shown himself to be a man of little substance. I think everything is important to consider.

1 Typical gun grabbing hack. "In 1999, Obama proposed to make it a felony for the gun owner if a firearm stolen from his residence and used in a crime was not “securely stored” — effectively negating the homeowner’s right to self-defense." So a dirtbag breaks into my home, steals my guns a property, and it's MY FAULT. He keeps saying we need change in Washington, yet this bastard is EXACTLY what's been there for 50 years, only now it has a shiny new Messiah complex.

2 "....won't play well in "flyover country," and could cost him the 2008 election." and the downside is......? (assuming he doesn't actually *win*, of course. %-)

1 "even if a perfectly justifiable situation that you still had a ten-percent chance of going to jail in a jury trial" I found that remark interesting. Did the course instructor give you any links or other info supporting this? Or was the point that if you got to a jury trial it probably wasn't justified, but you still only had a ten percent chance of going to jail?

2 No, he didn't provide any links or info to support this contention, but I'm not sure any was needed. He made the statement to reinforce the point that the way the laws of this state are set up, with very rigidly defined criteria justifying the use of deadly force, that juries very little leeway if you do go to trial, and that juries occasionally do make mistakes even then. I consider it a point made, and could care less about the specifics of whether an empirical study would find the actual conviction rate in a "good shoot" to be 2% or 20%. The point is that you're putting your life in the hands of a jury if you chose to draw your weapon, so you'd better be sure it truly is your last resort.

3 Thankfully, laws vary from state to state. Here in TN you have to be in fear of death or serious bodily injury. You do not have to retreat. In 2007, TN added a law that grants immunity from civil lawsuit if you injure or kill a bad guy while acting in self defense. If you ever decide to move, we'd be happy to have you here. Not as many restrictions on where you can carry either.

4 Here in CA if you have a CCW it's necessary to remember that, Microstamping-voodoo notwithstanding, every bullet fired has a Lawyer attached. So it's not simply probabilities of goign to jail, but a definite likelihood of hourly-rate, per-diems, and the lease oh his/her Lexus...

5 In my CCW class, my instructor handed out cards to a lawyer friend of his who specialized in shooting incidents. I'm considering the liability insurance that the NRA offers: For about $125/year, they'll pay most, if not all, of any damages against you in civil court.

6 Bob, The part of the law I love is the phrase: "...going armed to the terror of the public..." which stirs images of zombies roaming the streets of Cary. Got your CCW. Good for you. Anytime you want to do a trip to the range, let me know. I still have my slab-side, but it does OK for an old vet. As does its owner.

7 I got my CCL in Raleigh and I have to agree that the laws here are terrible. That's the price we pay for luring high tech jobs and voters from Massachusetts and California, and it's too high. I hadn't realized when I moved here ten years ago from Texas that I was leaving the South. I soon found out. The then mayor of Cary was running for reelection shortly thereafter on a platform literally of "I'm more liberal than Teddy Kennedy".

8 Interesting focus of your class. In Colorado, the gist of the CWP class could be summed up as follows: walk away from any confrontation if you can; if you fear imminent bodily harm, shoot to stop the threat; retain a lawyer before you speak to police. The "walk away" mantra is not due to any "duty to retreat" requirement, but merely a sensible attempt to avoid escalating a confrontation needlessly. It could only serve to bolster ones legal justification if shots are fired. It was a very common sense approach without all the legal jujitsu double speak. It was also made clear that a person involved in the legal use of lethal force will typically incur upwards of 50k in legal cost should they be prosecuted or sued.