August 29, 2006
Shooting for Truth
With the exposure of the "Pallywood" staging of events in Lebanon and Gaza recently, it is perhaps expected that we look at recent claims that a
Reuters news vehicle was hit by an Israeli air strike with a certain degree of skepticism, especially as similar attacks have been claimed recently, and
convincingly debunked. The fact that Reuters' own reporting of the incident
attempted to hide the identity of one of the journalists doesn't exactly lend their account of story much credibility.
And so much to his credit, AllahPundit has refused to take the easy way and assume that the Reuters air strike was faked. In fact, he makes a decent case that case that not only did the strike probably occur, but that 2.75" (70MM) rockets were the likely munition used, based upon the logical comments of someone claiming to be an intel expert:
My second theory, which I think is a slightly more probable, is that the van was attacked with two 70mm unguided rockets. Apaches and other helicopters frequently carry pods with these rockets...
...Although unguided, at close range they are very accurate. This scenario would better fit the report of two rockets since they are usually fired in pairs. Although not definitive, the damage could easily have come from hit from one of these rockets. The 70mm rocket has a smaller warhead than the hellfire and is typically impact detonated. I think the damage seen is consistent with a rocket of this type.
Based upon the opinion of a long-time Army chopper jockey I know who is still active in the aerospace defense establishment, I'm not sure that Allah's expert is correct, but from where I sit, that is kind of beside the point. The point is that good bloggers keep searching for proof where others in the blogosphere and in the professional media often seem to choose a storyline and insert the facts to fit their preconceived biases.
We may never know conclusively what happened in this air strike, but Allah is exhausting every effort at his disposal to make the attempt, and it's something more of us should try to do, both media amateurs and professionals alike.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:48 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 368 words, total size 3 kb.
1
I've read the 70mm rocket theory and even the "fast rust" explanation. Nonsense to me. Zombie's work has not been faulted.
Just where does a 70mm ( 2.75 inch ) rocket traveling at 2000 fps go when it hits something? Out the side or bottom causing tremendous damage. ( see zombie's picts of a real attack ).
I have the hi res Red Cross shot before they removed it. New rust is orange old rust is deep red. And the flange is clean. By the way there are many footprints on the roof. Just look for them.
Posted by: NortonPete at August 29, 2006 05:17 PM (fVuwW)
2
There was no penetration of the ambulance through the roof but the "clean" edge of the flange has torn screw holes. That is consistent with the vent cover being ripped off. The indentation of the roof and the pitting are consistent with a warhead detonating above the vehicle. Overpressure would dent things in, blow doors off.
The level of oxidation (rust) depends upon several factors such as the temperature of the blast and the shrapnel, as well as the chemical composition of the explosive used in the warhead.
What bothers me most about these discussions on the Qana ambulances and the Gaza TV vehicle is that far too many people make way too many assumptions and cling to them as fact. And it happens with other elements of this campaign as well. The baby pacifier that is allegedly planted because it is clean? It's not clean, or at least no more clean than the patch of green on the child's shorts and shirt on the same left side.
As for the F-16 flare photo that is allegedly a fake, that's another prime example of little proof being stretched into a major campaign of criticism. F-16s do drop in a dive, they do ripple off three bombs in an attack run and they DO deploy flares that look almost identical to one another, at least for the short time involved in the distance that they are from the aircraft in the Reuters photo.
I asked for one blogger to explain how he concluded that this was photoshopped and all he would say is that some unidentified expert told him so--so there. No name, no credentials, no documentation. How many times have the mainstream media been pounded on if they refused to answer queries or didn't respond in a timely fashion? Why do bloggers seem to feel that they have special rights to behave deifferently than what they demand of the media?
Make no mistake, I am absolutely no fan of the media. In fact, I became so disgusted over the incompetence and ignorance of reporters, photographers and editors that I coined the term "mediots" to describe media idiots. They don't know the difference between an armored personnel carrier and a tank, any more than they know a rocket from a missile. I strongly agree with demanding a higher standard of excellence form them, but I also demand it of the blogosphere as well. If not, what is the real difference between the MSM and the bloggers?
There is a tendency to over-reach and take things over the top. Last night, I saw a HOTAIR VENT episode by Michelle Malkin, where she showed tape of terorists using ambulances against the Geneva Conventions guidelines for their exemption from combat. Great. It spoke for itself. But then she threw in this Qana rocket hit story, the rust, how it couldn't have been damaged by the Israelis (even though they admitted and apologized), and so on. Credibility sank. The video of the enemy illegally using the ambulances in battle was diminished and diluted.
The biggest danger--and I have repeated this time and time again, without any apparent success--is that making assumptions, speculating and tossing accusations will cost us dearly when the enemy finds an easy way to disprove some of the claims being voiced in these and other pages.
Too many so-called experts voice their opinions without being checked out or proving their cases with documented fact. Recently, one blog had a comment from somebody claiming to be a former pilot who just knew that the F-16 photo was a fake because Aor Force planes drop their bombs wings-level. Take it to the bank, this former officer was just adamant. And he was dead wrong. The F-16 definitely does drop bombs in a dive. I have the photos to prove it and the personal experience to stand behind that. As an imagery interpreter, I used to score their hits on the bombing ranges, plotting out the impact points on imagery.
The problem is that you had comments from a guy who based his opinions--not facts, but opinions--on past experience without keeping abreast of the current technology of doing any research. That is about as lazy as most newspaper reporters, and why so many of them get a story dead wrong, roo. We have to do better than the papers and be bulletproof against enemy accusations of lies and fraud. This is NOT a game, but part of what is known as information warfare. It needs to be taken much more seriously and treated with more caution. Credibility is all-important but very easy to lose. Like virginity, once it is gone, there is no getting it back.
Posted by: RONALD LEWIS at August 31, 2006 03:15 PM (1wBAs)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 24, 2006
August 23, 2006
Carolina FreedomNet 2006
The John Locke Foundation will be hosting a half-day blogger conference,
Carolina FreedomNet 2006, open to all on Saturday, October 7 in Greensboro, North Carolina, from 8:00 AM-2:00 PM.
I've been invited to be on the 8:45 AM-10:15 AM Local vs. Global: What Should Be Your Blog's Focus? panel with Lorie Byrd of Wizbang, Sam Hieb of Sam's Notes, and Sister Toldjah.
A second panel of will attempt to answer the question of How Has The Blogging Phenomenon Affected Politics and Political Discourse?, and will feature Townhall.com's Mary Katharine Ham, Jeff Taylor of The Meck Deck, Scott Elliott of Election Projection and Josh Manchester of The Adventures of Chester.
Scott Johnson of Powerline will be giving the keynote speech, titled The 61st Minute: Inside the Eye of Hurricane Dan.
If interested in attending, you can register for Carolina FreedomNet 2006 here.
I hope to see you there.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:57 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 153 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Would love to be there, considering some of my most favorite bloggers will be speaking. Unfortunately I live on the other side of the world.
Any chance of some sort of live link-up?
In any case best wishes and hope it goes well.
Posted by: The Polarizer at August 23, 2006 11:27 AM (mfkDG)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 17, 2006
Quick Hits
Pat Dollard, the former agent who traded in the glitz of Hollywood for the grit of the Iraqi desert, is nearing completion of the feature film and follow-up cable series for Young Americans, which chronicles the lifes of Marines fighting in Al Anbar Province. He also has a "combat journal" that will be featured in
Maxim magazine in November.
Maxim Editor-in-Chief, Jimmy Jellinek, said the journal was, "the best thing written about the Marine Corps at war since the book 'Full Metal Jacket' was based on." That book, in case you were wondering, was Gustav Hadford's "
The Short Timers."
For folks new to Confederate Yankee in the past weeks, I invite you to take a look at Ward Brewer's Beauchamp Tower Corp's "Operation Enduring Service" blog. BTC is a not-for-profit corporation focused on two awesome goals. Part of their effort is to acquire World War II-era warships and turn them into museums.
BTC recently went to Mexico to acquire the former DD-574 John Rogers, the longest-serving Fletcher-class destroyer in the world, from the Mexican Navy, where combat veteran of Iwo Jima, Guandalcanal, and raids on Japan was on active duty until 2002. Ward has some cool pictures of the aging veteran from this recent foray, and milblogger John Donovan of Argghhh! chronicled the trip as well Start here and go. John Rogers will make its way to Mobile, Alabama where it will be turned into a Maritime Museum, and will be rededicated in November.
Brewer's Operation Enduring Service also has a major humainitarian goal as well, of converting retired naval transport vessels into state-of-the-art hurricane response ships to operate throughout the Gulf states and eastern seaboard. surprisingly enough, the federal government, particularly the U.S. Maritime Adminstration, is fighting this effort tooth and nail. Why they are against donating ships (that they intent to scrap anyway) to a life-saving effort is nothing less than insane.
Speaking of insane, Patterico demolishes sockpuppet master Glenn Greenwald (again) and his inane defense of the proven and admitted photo-staging that occurred in Lebanon. Ace piles on as well, as only Ace can do.
Oh, and torture? It works. Dolts can say otherwise, but it has been around for thousands of years becuase of it's effectiveness. I can sleep at night if pulling out a few fingernails (or worse) kept several thousand airline passengers from plunging into the Atlantic from 30,000 feet. As Al Davis says, "Just win, baby."
Ideals are nice, but don't do you much good as a corpse.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
12:31 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 419 words, total size 4 kb.
1
Maybe one reason torture has been around for centuries is that human nature, unfortunately, has always included cruelty. I still don't believe torture is successful in extracting information, and am saddened that our country seems to be sanctioning this. WWII was a bigger threat, due to the modern militaries we were up against, and I don't recall any justification of torture during that heroic era.
Posted by: Bill Nigh at August 17, 2006 09:23 AM (VQW+F)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
29kb generated in CPU 0.0454, elapsed 0.1273 seconds.
55 queries taking 0.1162 seconds, 148 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.