August 11, 2008
Accurate as Ever at the L.A. Times
Richard Serrano published a story in the Los Angeles on Sunday entitled
U.S. guns arm Mexican drug cartels.
In a marked improvement in the accuracy of Times stories, Serrano did not utter a factual inaccuracy until the third word of the article's first sentence.
High-powered automatic weapons and ammunition are flowing virtually unchecked from border states into Mexico, fueling a war among drug traffickers, the army and police that has left thousands dead, according to U.S. and Mexican officials.
The rifles being picked up along the border are of course not automatic weapons—machine guns—but are instead semi-automatic weapons which fire one bullet per trigger pull.
Further down in the article Serrano relates without question the claim that the FN Five-seveN pistol is armor-piercing, without bothering to see if armor-piercing ammunition is available for the pistols in the United States... and of course, it isn't, being barred for all but military and police sale by federal law.
Being ever helpful, I sent Mr. Serrano an email explaining where his story was wrong and needed corrections. Serrano has thus far neither responded, nor corrected his article.
In hopes of spurring some sort of interest in correcting the article, I emailed the National section editors of the Times, and made the radical suggestion that for future articles, they may want to consider interviewing actual gun experts instead of Mexican drug dealers when discussing the capabilities of firearms.
I doubt they'll listen to such suggestions, but we can always hope.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
03:36 PM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 260 words, total size 2 kb.
1
"The rifles being picked up along the border are of course not automatic weapons—machine guns—but are instead semi-automatic weapons which fire one bullet per trigger pull."
He must have been using DC's definition of automatic weapons.
Idiotic, totally idiotic.
Posted by: Matt at August 11, 2008 03:43 PM (rHW2R)
2
PS. The Five-seveN is junk. Terminal and external ballistics stink.
Posted by: Matt at August 11, 2008 03:44 PM (rHW2R)
3
That is a snarky piece, even by current standards.
Let me see if I get this straight. He says that Mexican drug dealers are buying automatic weapons from US gun dealers, sometimes using straw man purchasers, and smuggling the guns back across the Mexican border. If that is what he is saying, then every single step in that process is already a federal crime. It is a federal crime for dealers to sell to non-citizens, (except resident aliens) and it is a crime for non-citizens to attempt to buy. It is a federal crime to sell automatic weapons to any civilian and it is a federal crime for ordinary civilians to possess same. It is a federal crime for any dealer to sell to any civilian who is not a resident of the state in which the dealer is licensed and it is a federal crime for any civilian to buy or attempt to buy a gun from a dealer outside of his or her state of residence. It is a federal crime to buy or sell a gun through a straw man purchaser. It is a federal crime to export a gun without an export license.
If this stuff is really happening, why don't they just start making arrests? Why is it necessary to advocate new laws to make it "double" illegal? If they know who is doing it, arrest them. If they don't know, how does a new law have an affect?
Here is the part that is the cherry on this slimy piece of cake:
"More than 6,700 licensed gun dealers have set up shop within a short drive of the 2,000-mile border, from the Gulf Coast of Texas to San Diego -- which amounts to more than three dealers for every mile of border territory. Law enforcement has come to call the region an "iron river of guns."
He implies that all these dealers have recently set up shop to cash in on this cross border trade. He does not define what is "a short drive", but if this range includes Los Angeles, San Diego, Tucson, El Paso, Laredo, Brownsville, San Antonio and every pawn shop and Walmart therein and in between, then the total number might be 6,700, but is that a larger number of gun dealers per capita than any comparable region of the rest of the US? Somehow, I doubt it.
Oh, and the bit about the guns being traced to the US is a disgusting bit of deception as well. Remember, these drug dealers are masters of smuggling and black market trading. If they can obtain and move large amounts of heroin and cocaine from places like Bolivia and Venezuela, it is hard to imagine that they can't find all the guns they want on the international black market in weapons. So, if a US made AR15 is sold to the Columbian Army, stolen by the FARC rebels and sold on the black market to Mexican cocaine smugglers, then, yes, that gun can be traced to the US. Whatever else such a trade might represent, it is not grounds for further infringement of the people's right to keep and bear arms, (which is his real goal.)
But maybe the guy has a point, in addition to the one on the top of his head. If all this is true, then the surest remedy is to build an impenetrable fence along the US/Mexican border from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific. If it will help disarm the smugglers it will be worth it.
Posted by: George Bruce at August 11, 2008 04:30 PM (v4XVE)
4
"But maybe the guy has a point, in addition to the one on the top of this head. If all this...."
George, there are times in your life when you say, " I wish I had said that", but damn, that post just might be the sweetest read I've had in quite a while, and yes, I wish I had said that!
Posted by: templar knight at August 11, 2008 05:22 PM (JkXo/)
5
The LAT can't go out of business soon enough for me.
Posted by: Purple Avenger at August 11, 2008 05:29 PM (Ub4J5)
6
Well, why would the reporter, who clearly has a position he wants to advance, want to be bothered by facts. Apparently J-school is for those who want to do more of an advocacy based writing career. But reporters, excuse me, journalists, are always making these kinds of errors, on all sorts of topics.
Posted by: Penfold at August 12, 2008 08:45 AM (lF2Kk)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
HuffPo: War in Georgia Engineered To Help McCain
Sadly, he
appears to be serious:
In classic "Wag The Dog" scenario there is a neat little war brewing between American and Russian proxies, and real Russian troops, in the Caucacus Mountains on the Russian border.
It couldn't come at a better time for the Republicans.
McCain gets to act and talk tough against the Russians, while Obama is on vacation in Hawaii, issuing "can't we all get along statements."
It perfectly augments Republican campaign points: Obama is not ready. He is not tough, experienced enough to deal with a dangerous world.
Do you appreciate the power and planning that went into this? I don't think you do.
Not only did McCain engineer the the build-up of Russian forces along the border of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, he also orchestrated the Georgian offer of a ceasefire last week, the South Ossetia separatist's response of shelling Georgia, and the Georgian counterstrike that triggered the pre-planned Russian invasion— all carefully timed to coincide with Barack Obama's vacation.
As it is obvious to see, thousands of people have been killed and a country invaded and ripped apart, just to give John McCain a chance to sound tough. But the plot is even more insidious than HuffPo author Blake Fleetwood suggests.
Not only did McCain carefully orchestrate three armed forces in two countries in such a way that it looked like they were acting selfishly in their own best interests instead of as agents of a U.S. Presidential campaign, he also managed to convince Barack Obama to give a spineless response that made McCain sound like a far more knowledgeable, experienced, and competent leader that Obama has ever pretended to be.
The kicker?
In the absolutely most fantabulous move of all, McCain then convinced Obama to flip-flop on his previous spineless position to poorly echo McCain's stance, reinforcing it as the correct one, while gutting his own credibility and showing himself to be hopelessly incapable of performing as a President.
John McCain: He bends steel and breaks candidates and countries with his mind.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 355 words, total size 2 kb.
HuffPo: War in Georgia Engineered To Help McCain
Sadly, he
appears to be serious:
In classic "Wag The Dog" scenario there is a neat little war brewing between American and Russian proxies, and real Russian troops, in the Caucacus Mountains on the Russian border.
It couldn't come at a better time for the Republicans.
McCain gets to act and talk tough against the Russians, while Obama is on vacation in Hawaii, issuing "can't we all get along statements."
It perfectly augments Republican campaign points: Obama is not ready. He is not tough, experienced enough to deal with a dangerous world.
Do you appreciate the power and planning that went into this? I don't think you do.
Not only did McCain engineer the build-up of Russian forces along the border of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, he also orchestrated the Georgian offer of a ceasefire last week, the South Ossetia separatist's response of shelling Georgia, and the Georgian counterstrike that triggered the pre-planned Russian invasion— all carefully timed to coincide with Barack Obama's vacation.
As it is obvious to see, thousands of people have been killed and a country invaded and ripped apart, just to give John McCain a chance to sound tough. But the plot is even more insidious than HuffPo author Blake Fleetwood suggests.
Not only did McCain carefully orchestrate three armed forces in two countries in such a way that it looked like they were acting selfishly in their own best interests instead of as agents of a U.S. Presidential campaign, he also managed to convince Barack Obama to give a spineless response that made McCain sound like a far more knowledgeable, experienced, and competent leader that OBama has ever pretended to be.
The kicker?
In the absolutely most fantabulous move of all, McCain then convinced Obama to flip-flop on his previous spineless position to poorly echo McCain's stance, reinforcing it as the correct one, while gutting his own credibility and showing himself to be hopelessly incapable of performing as a President.
John McCain. He bends steel and breaks candidates and countries with his mind.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
10:25 AM
| Comments (17)
| Add Comment
Post contains 354 words, total size 2 kb.
1
I think you misunderstand cause and effect. The Huffpo blogger didn't say McCain CAUSED the war, just that he benefits from the effects of it. And really, how is this any different than Charlie Black saying that another terrorist attack would be good for McCain?
Posted by: DSB at August 11, 2008 11:31 AM (c2FAa)
2
Of course McCain benefits from the Russian aggression and threat to other democracies in the region. He benefits from
any honest focus on
serious issues because Obama has no credible policies, just pseudo-charisma and rhetoric.
The images of Russian aggression drag the voter away from the MSM's "Entertainment Tonight Presidential campaign" and back to a Cold War or 9-12-2001 mindset. Any serious voter will snap out of the Obama fairy tale and realize that "Good Grief, Putin will eat this neophyte for lunch and ask what's for dessert."
Posted by: capitano at August 11, 2008 12:09 PM (+NO33)
3
To dbeden@gmail.com
You said "The Huffpo blogger didn't say McCain CAUSED the war."
Is that so??
Did you not understand the statment?
"In classic "Wag The Dog" scenario"
Look it up...
Tins...
Posted by: Tinstaafl at August 11, 2008 12:34 PM (tsi/8)
4
John McCain, you magnificent bastard!!
Posted by: tonynoboloney at August 11, 2008 12:37 PM (axuse)
5
HuffPo is just one of the larger insane asylums in the "rreality-based community".
Posted by: Nahanni at August 11, 2008 12:39 PM (TaiG5)
6
Obviously, Putin didn't want the incredible leadership of "The One" to overshadow himself, so he decided to have a war that "distracts" from the "celebrity" of "The One" and forces Americans to consider unreasonable lunatics like Putin (much like the Joker in Batman) that don't take to the incredible negotiating skills of "The One" (which have never been demonstrated before).
I also have some beach front property in New Mexico for sale.
Posted by: Neo at August 11, 2008 01:19 PM (Yozw9)
7
Better yet, a few of the Leftosphere sites are now complaining that parts of McCain's statement was lifted from Wikipedia.
The world could be burning and these clowns are still dotting the "i"-s and crossing the "t"-s.
Posted by: Neo at August 11, 2008 02:16 PM (Yozw9)
8
What really has to frost the Obama braintrust is that this crisis came out of the blue, and after Obama foreign policy advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski met with Iran's buttboy, Syria's Assad, to forestall any dustup in the MiddleEast prior to the election.
Nancy Pelosi even made a followup visit to Assad to confirm the message to Iran -- no funny stuff before the November election, it can only hurt the team. What a bunch of lightweights.
Posted by: capitano at August 11, 2008 04:05 PM (+NO33)
9
capitano - "Of course McCain benefits from the Russian aggression and threat to other democracies in the region. He benefits from any honest focus on serious issues because Obama has no credible policies, just pseudo-charisma and rhetoric."
ding ding ding ding!!!! We have a winner!
Anything that actually wakes people up and makes them pay attention is bad for Obama... he needs people daydreaming about change and hope to have any shot of winning the election. Too many people actually paying attention will draw attention to his obvious lack of any experience, lack of any realistic ideas, and lack of any serious thoughts regarding real world issues.
Posted by: GL at August 11, 2008 04:05 PM (vpAFg)
10
Imagine if this war had broken out two weeks ago while Obama was in Europe.
The one major fact that seems to be treated as a non-sequitur is that fact that most of Europe is on vacation this month, a fact that I'm sure the Russians took into consideration.
If Russia had attack France during August, they would not have mounted a defense until September.
Posted by: Neo at August 11, 2008 04:33 PM (Yozw9)
11
Hmmm can we expect a strident dhimmierat response to this invasion. Will Code Pink protest? Will Soros fund a resistance movement?
It is as Chamberlain said before he winked at the Nazis, "a little country, far away, of which we know little." I expect the same statement from the dhimmies soon along with a harsh letter condemning the Russians to the NY Times.
Posted by: Thomas Jackson at August 11, 2008 05:20 PM (LHaZf)
12
I... I... I... for once, I can't parody these folks... they've become
self-parodying!
Posted by: C-C-G at August 11, 2008 05:46 PM (MAHZ+)
13
In Wag The Dog, a fake war was fabricated to deflect from a political sex scandal. Which party exactly currently has a sex scandal breaking? J'ASSUSE!
Posted by: BohicaTwentyTwo at August 12, 2008 07:47 AM (oC8nQ)
14
re: Huffpo Too many freaks, not enough circuses.
Posted by: Huntress at August 12, 2008 12:19 PM (Qn9iF)
15
Georgia will benefit McCain over Obama. We know McCain. He’s proven himself with 50 years of service to America. He had a distinguished military career and has been a leader in Congress. Most of all, when no one is watching, he will do the right thing. He has integrity.
Obama has no experience, no record, no plan, no leadership, no judgment and no integrity. Politically, he is closer to Mikhail Gorbachev than John McCain. Hillary’s 3 AM phone call ad is more relevant today than ever before. Barack's word is worth nothing.
Posted by: arch at August 12, 2008 02:30 PM (EQFru)
16
Arch, let's also remember, McCain's first reaction was the correct one, whereas Obama had to change his tune twice before he finally decided to echo McCain.
This comes from McCain actually studying our enemies, while Obama just wants to invite them for tea where he can join them in denouncing America.
Posted by: C-C-G at August 12, 2008 09:05 PM (MAHZ+)
17
"These aren't the talking points you're looking for."
"Move on..."
/snerk
Posted by: Casey at August 15, 2008 01:35 AM (RJSy/)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 07, 2008
Advocacy Journalism Today: WaPo/Mosk Just Keeps Coming
After having Matthew Mosk's
attack on John McCain discredited within hours yesterday, the Washington
Post was forced into running this embarrassing correction to the A1 story.
Correction to This Article
An earlier version of this story about campaign donations that Florida businessman Harry Sargeant III raised for Sen. John McCain, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton incorrectly identified three individuals as being among the donors Sargeant solicited on behalf of McCain. Those donors -- Rite Aid manager Ibrahim Marabeh, and lounge owners Nadia and Shawn Abdalla -- wrote checks to Giuliani and Clinton, not McCain. Also, the first name of Faisal Abdullah, a McCain donor, was misspelled in some versions of the story.
In other words, the premise of the entire article was fatally undermined because a Obama-supporting journalist and his editors didn't take the time to do the basic fact-checking Amanda Carpenter did in a matter of minutes.
The same "journalist", Mosk had attempted to smear McCain in a previous manufactured story about a land deal in May.
The Washington Post's editors, perhaps thinking they can save on the cost of paper and ink by adopting the editorial business practices of the New York Times, let Mosk go to print again today with another smear, one that amounted to stating that—gosh darn it!—there was nothing illegal going on with MCCain's fund-raising, but there should be:
Sargeant told The New York Times this morning that he at times left the task of collecting the checks to a longtime business partner, Mustafa Abu Naba'a. The problem with that is that Abu Naba'a is not an American citizen. According to court records, Abu Naba'a is a dual citizen of Jordan and the Dominican Republic.
The law on this question appears to be unclear, said Fred Wertheimer, a campaign finance expert who runs the advocacy group, Democracy 21.
"There's probably very little law on this," Wertheimer said. "If it is not illegal for a foreign national to bundle checks, it ought to be, since it's illegal for a foreign national to make contributions in the first place."
As even as Democracy 21 admits, there is nothing illegal about a legal foreign national collecting the legal contributions of law-abiding Americans for a Presidential candidate.
What is perhaps even more revealing that what they said, however, is Mosk's decision to use them as a source. Democracy 21 is a far left advocacy group, run by a former Democratic Senator Dick Clark, and is funded by both George Soros' Open Society Institute, and the Joyce Foundation—yes, where Barack Obama sat on the Board of Directors for eight years.
Mosk's choice of sources is only slightly more objective than contacting MoveOn.Org for their opinion.
Paul Ryan, a lawyer with the Campaign Legal Center, said the Federal Election Commission has not explicitly addressed the question. Ryan said there appeared to be conflicting thoughts on this in a 2004 advisory opinion. For instance, in one opinion the FEC has advised that it is permissible for a foreign national to solicit a contribution, while in another it prohibits foreign nationals from playing any role in participation in a candidate's election activities, such as decisions concerning the making of contributions.
"There's a little bit of tension between these two different interpretations," Ryan said.
Matthew Mosk hasn't been able to find a way to smear John McCain, despite three abortive attempts. The questions isn't so much why Mosk is against McCain, but why the editors of the Washington Post keep letting themselves be used as a platform for his specious attacks.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
01:28 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 608 words, total size 4 kb.
1
And how much interest was shown by WaPo in Norman Hsu and the indigent Chinese busboys? Not quite none and I suppose we should be greatful for that. With all this interest today, though, I wonder when we may expect a scrub of Barry's operation. Just how much did Ayers raise for him, anyhow? What is he up to now? Anything?
Posted by: megapotamus at August 07, 2008 03:26 PM (LF+qW)
2
This guy either needs to go to remedial spelling classes or needs new glasses if he confuses the names "Giuliani" and "Clinton" with "McCain."
Posted by: C-C-G at August 07, 2008 05:33 PM (irkBP)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
41kb generated in CPU 0.0497, elapsed 0.119 seconds.
54 queries taking 0.1077 seconds, 176 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.