April 20, 2006

Click. Print. Bang.

Greg Mitchell, editor of Editor & Publisher, asks the media do what it can to overthrow the Bush Administration. Within legal bounds, of course:


No matter which party they generally favor or political stripes they wear, newspapers and other media outlets need to confront the fact that America faces a crisis almost without equal in recent decades.

Our president, in a time of war, terrorism and nuclear intrigue, will likely remain in office for another 33 months, with crushingly low approval ratings that are still inching lower. Facing a similar problem, voters had a chance to quickly toss Jimmy Carter out of office, and did so. With a similar lengthy period left on his White House lease, Richard Nixon quit, facing impeachment. Neither outcome is at hand this time.

Lacking an impending election, or a real impeachable scandal, what does Mitchell plead?


The alarm should be bi-partisan. Many Republicans fear their president's image as a bumbler will hurt their party for years. The rest may fret about the almost certain paralysis within the administration, or a reversal of certain favorite policies. A Gallup poll this week revealed that 44% of Republicans want some or all troops brought home from Iraq. Do they really believe that their president will do that any time soon, if ever?

Democrats, meanwhile, cross their fingers that Bush doesn't do something really stupid -- i.e. nuke Iran -- while they try to win control of at least one house in Congress by doing nothing yet somehow earning (they hope) the anti-Bush vote.

Meanwhile, a severely weakened president retains, and has shown he is willing to use, all of his commander-in-chief authority, and then some.

What are you asking for, Mr. Mitchell? Are you asking you friends in the professional media to gin up outrage and hysteria, in hopes that in a nation of 300 million... no, you couldn't be.

It seems possible:


I don't have a solution myself now, although all pleas for serious probes, journalistic or official, of the many alleged White House misdeeds should be heeded. But my point here is simply to start the discussion, and urge that the media, first, recognize that the crisis—or, if you want to say, impending crisis -- exists, and begin to explore the ways to confront it.

Start the discussion. Urge the media. Confront Bush. And thenÂ…

Right?

Posted by: Confederate Yankee at 01:00 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 397 words, total size 3 kb.

1 I guess if you try really hard to not believe in Iran, it will just go away?

Posted by: Retired Navy at April 20, 2006 01:17 PM (Mv/2X)

2 I just love how it's been the MSM and liberals that have generated this "image of a bad presidency" over the last few years... only to now act surprised and demand action be taken on this "image of a bad presidency". Strawman, anyone?

Posted by: TexasRainmaker at April 20, 2006 01:19 PM (TwSjW)

3 Even Fox News agrees: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192468,00.html

Posted by: Ed at April 20, 2006 02:20 PM (V/JOf)

4 Interestingly, Bush's poll #s track closely with gas prices. Not sure how he's "severely weakened," though. Sounds more like someone at E&P is severely delusional and paranoid. I do believe it is much more likely than most people think that Bush will be assassinated. The media pretty much ignored the unsuccessful attempt on his life in the republic of Georgia, which failed only because the grenade thrown at him was a dud.

Posted by: TallDave at April 20, 2006 02:22 PM (t55h2)

5 Interestingly, Bush's poll #s track closely with gas prices. Not sure how he's "severely weakened," though. Sounds more like someone at E&P is severely delusional and paranoid. I do believe it is much more likely than most people think that Bush will be assassinated. The media pretty much ignored the unsuccessful attempt on his life in the republic of Georgia, which failed only because the grenade thrown at him was a dud.

Posted by: TallDave at April 20, 2006 02:25 PM (t55h2)

6 Yankee, who do you hate more? G-dless Liberals or the Terrorists?

Posted by: Shambles at April 20, 2006 02:28 PM (r77Gr)

7 Mitchell's the south end of a northbound horse. He basically wants the media to start wringing their hands and say "The sky is falling!" Like they haven't been doing that for the last five years.

Posted by: Brainster at April 20, 2006 03:47 PM (hEScd)

8 "urge the media to gin up outrage and hysteria" Tell me, how is that different from what they, the media, already do? One of the media's main problems is that they have cried 'wolf' falsely so many times that in a real crisis, many will not listen to them.

Posted by: docdave at April 20, 2006 04:10 PM (0HeoE)

9 Does anyone remember the nut-case that crashed a small plane on the White House lawn, killing himself while the Clintons weren't home? Any POTUS knows that there is a Hinckley in every hedge, and if it were not for the Secret Service, the Capitol Police, FBI, our votes wouldn't matter, as a loony could destroy any democracy that we have.

Posted by: Tom TB at April 20, 2006 05:46 PM (Ffvoi)

10 Mitchell should be careful what he asks for...considering the "dark lord" Cheney is VP. 3 years of Cheney as prez would be acceptable to me.

Posted by: Purple Avenger at April 20, 2006 05:49 PM (4MB5o)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
19kb generated in CPU 0.024, elapsed 0.1036 seconds.
54 queries taking 0.0936 seconds, 161 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.