March 18, 2006
Most of the people interviewed for this article were midlevel civilian and military Defense Department personnel who worked with Task Force 6-26 and said they witnessed abuses, or who were briefed on its operations over the past three years.Many were initially reluctant to discuss Task Force 6-26 because its missions are classified. But when pressed repeatedly by reporters who contacted them, they agreed to speak about their experiences and observations out of what they said was anger and disgust over the unit's treatment of detainees and the failure of task force commanders to punish misconduct more aggressively. The critics said the harsh interrogations yielded little information to help capture insurgents or save American lives. [my bold - ed.]
Once again, the Times is unable or unwilling to provide any direct evidence of their charges, relying on anonymous sources and injuries that could have come from combat against American forces or resisting capture as well as the abuse they allege.
I hope survivors of the overzealous NY Times interrogations weren't coerced into giving statements under duress that would free insurgents or endanger American lives.
I'd hate to have to drag Bill Keller in front of a tribunal...
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
08:42 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 237 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: benning at March 18, 2006 10:46 PM (GXvlP)
Posted by: ArthurStone at March 19, 2006 10:25 AM (iI6rf)
54 queries taking 0.1098 seconds, 153 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.