June 15, 2007
The bill, introduced to the Senate on May 8 by Dianne Feinstein and co-sponsored by Senators Kennedy, Levin, Menendez, Mikulski, Clinton, Durbin, Boxer, Lautenberg, Shumer and Dodd (Democrats all), seeks to classify all firearms chambered for .50 BMG and similar calibers as "destructive devices" under the Gun Control Act of 1968 and the National Firearms Act of 1934.
Presently, the "destructive device" ban in both laws refers to poison gas, bombs, grenades, rockets, missiles, and mines.
These Senators are attempting to equate large caliber target rifles with poison gas and bombs under the law. Why?
U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), today introduced legislation to regulate the transfer and possession of .50 BMG caliber sniper rifles, which have extraordinary firepower and range (more than a mile with accuracy, with a maximum distance of up to four miles). These combat-style weapons are capable of bringing down airliners and helicopters that are taking off or landing, puncturing pressurized chemical storage facilities, and penetrating light armored personnel vehicles and protective limousines.[snip]
"These are combat-style weapons designed to kill people efficiently and destroy machinery at a great distance. This legislation would regulate these dangerous combat weapons, making it harder for terrorists and others to buy them for illegitimate use," Senator Feinstein said. "This legislation doesn't ban any firearms; it would only institute common-sense regulations for the sale of these dangerous sniper rifles."
Capable of bringing down airliners and helicopters? A .50 BMG rifle must make huge holes in aircraft to do that, wouldn't you think?
Not so much.
Thi is the rough difference between the diameter of a .50-caliber bullet (left) and the extremely common .30-caliber rifle (right).
Now, take into account that a typical .50-caliber rifle is roughly five-feet long weighs around 30 pounds, requiring them to be shot from a bipod or some other sort of support, and virtually all .50-caliber rifles use telescopic sights. Most are also single-shot, bolt-action firearms.
Feinstein and the other Democrat Senators sponsoring this bill are asking you to believe that a terrorist "super-sniper" can somehow heft a 30-pound gun and wingshoot an airliner like a clay pigeon.
The odds of a sniper hitting an airliner moving in three dimensions faster than a NASCAR stock car is infinitesimal; the odds of Feinstien's hypothetical terrorists actually bringing down a plane verge on the impossible.
What of the threat of a terrorist using such a rifle to penetrate a chemical storage tank or rail car?
According to a builder of such pressurized vessels, also virtually impossible:
When asked about the alleged threat of .50cal rifles to his railcars, Mr. Darymple said that they have long tested their cars against almost every form of firearm, to include .50BMG and larger. When asked what happens when a .50 hits one of his tanks he said with a shrug "It bounces off." He went on to point out that railcars are designed to survive the force of derailing, and collision with other railcars at travel speeds. By comparison the impact of a bullet, any bullet, is like a mosquito bite.
It also goes without saying that if terrorists did desire to take down an airliner, or blow up a railcar or chemical storage tank, they are far more likely to acquire smaller, less obtrusive, more accurate, purpose-built or improvised devices already covered under federal law.
So what is the true purpose of the bill, when the stated purposes simply don't make sense?
Only the Senators themselves know for certain, but IÂ’d be willing to bet it comes wrapped in a cloak of fear and ignorance.
Posted by: Confederate Yankee at
03:31 PM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 662 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: GeorgeH at June 15, 2007 04:08 PM (Jkcjv)
Posted by: Fredrick at June 15, 2007 09:16 PM (TcNVg)
Posted by: Tincan Sailor at June 16, 2007 11:01 AM (L4HGI)
Posted by: jbiccum at June 16, 2007 03:19 PM (Rd4s4)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at June 16, 2007 04:57 PM (jnC6a)
Posted by: the_velociraptor at June 16, 2007 06:02 PM (DqYja)
Posted by: Purple Avenger at June 16, 2007 10:19 PM (jnC6a)
Posted by: Project Vote Smart at June 18, 2007 05:09 PM (Z+KDc)
Posted by: the_velociraptor at June 20, 2007 12:12 AM (DqYja)
Posted by: Dan Irving at June 20, 2007 01:20 PM (zw8QA)
54 queries taking 0.0894 seconds, 161 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.